mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structsum Generation for Faster Text Comprehension

arXiv 2401.06837 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the task of generating structured representations of text using large language models (LLMs). We focus on tables and mind maps as representative modalities. Tables are more organized way of representing data, while mind maps provide a visually dynamic and flexible approach, particularly suitable for sparse content. Despite the effectiveness of LLMs on different tasks, we show that current models struggle with generating structured outputs. In response, we present effective prompting strategies for both of these tasks. We introduce a taxonomy of problems around factuality, global and local structure, common to both modalities and propose a set of critiques to tackle these issues resulting in an absolute improvement in accuracy of +37pp (79%) for mind maps and +15pp (78%) for tables. To evaluate semantic coverage of generated structured representations we propose Auto-QA, and we verify the adequacy of Auto-QA using SQuAD dataset. We further evaluate the usefulness of structured representations via a text comprehension user study. The results show a significant reduction in comprehension time compared to text when using table (42.9%) and mind map (31.9%), without loss in accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2024.

Builds on

27 of 41 references.

References · 27

  1. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  3. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  4. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  5. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  6. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
  7. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 575
  8. 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 558
  9. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  10. 2021Efficient Attentions for Long Document Summarizationcited by 345
  11. 2022UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigmscited by 295
  12. 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 287
15 more
  1. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 236
  2. 2016Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Wordscited by 116
  3. 2022Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Modelscited by 112
  4. 2023Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generationcited by 97
  5. 2022Successive Prompting for Decomposing Complex Questionscited by 94
  6. 2020Towards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summarycited by 88
  7. 2021Text-to-Table: A New Way of Information Extractioncited by 47
  8. 2019Global Reasoning over Database Structures for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 43
  9. 2021Data-to-text Generation with Macro Planningcited by 34
  10. 2022Table-To-Text generation and pre-training with TabT5cited by 20
  11. 2023A Sequence-to-Sequence&Set Model for Text-to-Table Generationcited by 16
  12. 2022STable: Table Generation Framework for Encoder-Decoder Modelscited by 15
  13. 2018Scalable Micro-planned Generation of Discourse from Structured Datacited by 12
  14. 2023Unified Text Structuralization with Instruction-tuned Language Modelscited by 8
  15. 2021Efficient Mind-Map Generation via Sequence-to-Graph and Reinforced Graph Refinementcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

9 papers.