mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imprecise Class Labels

arXiv 2505.22028 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive learning has achieved remarkable success in learning effective representations, with supervised contrastive learning often outperforming self-supervised approaches. However, in real-world scenarios, data annotations are often ambiguous or inaccurate, meaning that class labels may not reliably indicate whether two examples belong to the same class. This limitation restricts the applicability of supervised contrastive learning. To address this challenge, we introduce the concept of ``continuous semantic similarity'' to define positive and negative pairs. Instead of directly relying on imprecise class labels, we measure the semantic similarity between example pairs, which quantifies how closely they belong to the same category by iteratively refining weak supervisory signals. Based on this concept, we propose a graph-theoretic framework for weakly-supervised contrastive learning, where semantic similarity serves as the graph weights. Our framework is highly versatile and can be applied to many weakly-supervised learning scenarios. We demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments in two common settings, i.e., noisy label and partial label learning, where existing methods can be easily integrated to significantly improve performance. Theoretically, we establish an error bound for our approach, showing that it can approximate supervised contrastive learning under mild conditions. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/Speechless-10308/WSC.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

43 of 70 references.

References · 43

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  4. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  5. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  6. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  7. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  10. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  11. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  12. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
31 more
  1. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  2. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  3. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  4. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  5. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  6. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  7. 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  8. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  9. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  10. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  11. 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
  12. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  13. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
  14. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  15. 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
  16. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  17. 2019Learning with Multiple Complementary Labelscited by 53
  18. 2021Mixture Proportion Estimation and PU Learning: A Modern Approachcited by 52
  19. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  20. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  21. 2017Learning from Ambiguously Labeled Face Imagescited by 29
  22. 2023Twin Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 28
  23. 2023A Graph-Theoretic Framework for Understanding Open-World Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 22
  24. 2021On the Robustness of Average Losses for Partial-Label Learningcited by 20
  25. 2023Rethinking Weak Supervision in Helping Contrastive Learningcited by 18
  26. 2024Vision-Language Models are Strong Noisy Label Detectorscited by 16
  27. 2024Continuous Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised Recognitioncited by 10
  28. 2023Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurationscited by 9
  29. 2024Robust Semi-Supervised Learning in Open Environmentscited by 8
  30. 2024Mixed Blessing: Class-Wise Embedding guided Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 7
  31. 2013Approximation Algorithm for Sparsest k-Partitioningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.