mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparator-Adaptive Phi-Regret: Improved Bounds, Simpler Algorithms, and Applications to Games

arXiv 2505.17277 ↗First posted 22 May 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the classic expert problem, Phi-regret measures the gap between the learner's total loss and that achieved by applying the best action transformation φ ∈ Phi. A recent work by Lu et al., [2025] introduces an adaptive algorithm whose regret against a comparator φ depends on a certain sparsity-based complexity measure of φ, (almost) recovering and interpolating optimal bounds for standard regret notions such as external, internal, and swap regret. In this work, we propose a general idea to achieve an even better comparator-adaptive Phi-regret bound via much simpler algorithms compared to Lu et al., [2025]. Specifically, we discover a prior distribution over all possible binary transformations and show that it suffices to achieve prior-dependent regret against these transformations. Then, we propose two concrete and efficient algorithms to achieve so, where the first one learns over multiple copies of a prior-aware variant of the Kernelized MWU algorithm of Farina et al., [2022], and the second one learns over multiple copies of a prior-aware variant of the BM-reduction [Blum and Mansour, 2007]. To further showcase the power of our methods and the advantages over Lu et al., [2025] besides the simplicity and better regret bounds, we also show that our second approach can be extended to the game setting to achieve accelerated and adaptive convergence rate to Phi-equilibria for a class of general-sum games. When specified to the special case of correlated equilibria, our bound improves over the existing ones from Anagnostides et al., [2022a,b]

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

Builds on

22 of 47 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 417
  2. 2013Optimization, Learning, and Games with Predictable Sequencescited by 188
  3. 2015Fast Convergence of Regularized Learning in Gamescited by 150
  4. 2021Near-Optimal No-Regret Learning in General Gamescited by 85
  5. 2021Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 66
  6. 2021Impossible Tuning Made Possible: A New Expert Algorithm and Its Applicationscited by 52
  7. 2015Second-order Quantile Methods for Experts and Combinatorial Gamescited by 49
  8. 2016MetaGrad: Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learningcited by 47
  9. 2021Near-Optimal No-Regret Learning for Correlated Equilibria in Multi-Player General-Sum Gamescited by 43
  10. 2022No-Regret Learning in Time-Varying Zero-Sum Gamescited by 36
  11. 2022Uncoupled Learning Dynamics with O(log T) Swap Regret in Multiplayer Gamescited by 35
  12. 2017Parameter-free online learning via model selectioncited by 34
10 more
  1. 2023Fast swap regret minimization and applications to approximate correlated equilibriacited by 32
  2. 2022On Last-Iterate Convergence Beyond Zero-Sum Gamescited by 31
  3. 2022Near-Optimal No-Regret Learning Dynamics for General Convex Gamescited by 25
  4. 2019Combining Online Learning Guaranteescited by 22
  5. 2022Kernelized Multiplicative Weights for 0/1-Polyhedral Games: Bridging the Gap Between Learning in Extensive-Form and Normal-Form Gamescited by 19
  6. 2020Online Linear Optimization with Many Hintscited by 16
  7. 2025Faster Rates for No-Regret Learning in General Games via Cautious Optimismcited by 10
  8. 2021Minimax Optimal Quantile and Semi-Adversarial Regret via Root-Logarithmic Regularizerscited by 8
  9. 2023Constrained Phi-Equilibriacited by 4
  10. 2025Sparsity-Based Interpolation of External, Internal and Swap Regretcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.