mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Consuming Generative Models with Adversarially Curated Data

arXiv 2505.09768 ↗First posted 14 May 2025cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in generative models have made it increasingly difficult to distinguish real data from model-generated synthetic data. Using synthetic data for successive training of future model generations creates "self-consuming loops", which may lead to model collapse or training instability. Furthermore, synthetic data is often subject to human feedback and curated by users based on their preferences. Ferbach et al. (2024) recently showed that when data is curated according to user preferences, the self-consuming retraining loop drives the model to converge toward a distribution that optimizes those preferences. However, in practice, data curation is often noisy or adversarially manipulated. For example, competing platforms may recruit malicious users to adversarially curate data and disrupt rival models. In this paper, we study how generative models evolve under self-consuming retraining loops with noisy and adversarially curated data. We theoretically analyze the impact of such noisy data curation on generative models and identify conditions for the robustness of the retraining process. Building on this analysis, we design attack algorithms for competitive adversarial scenarios, where a platform with a limited budget employs malicious users to misalign a rival's model from actual user preferences. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  5. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
  6. 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 151
  7. 2024Aligning with Human Judgement: The Role of Pairwise Preference in Large Language Model Evaluatorscited by 149
  8. 2023On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Datacited by 100
  9. 2018Label Sanitization against Label Flipping Poisoning Attackscited by 73
  10. 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignmentcited by 61
  11. 2022Data Feedback Loops: Model-driven Amplification of Dataset Biasescited by 60
  12. 2024Fairness Feedback Loops: Training on Synthetic Data Amplifies Biascited by 55
10 more
  1. 2024Self-Consuming Generative Models with Curated Data Provably Optimize Human Preferencescited by 39
  2. 2024Self-Correcting Self-Consuming Loops for Generative Model Trainingcited by 37
  3. 2024Best-of-Venom: Attacking RLHF by Injecting Poisoned Preference Datacited by 35
  4. 2024Self-Improving Diffusion Models with Synthetic Datacited by 35
  5. 2020Practical Data Poisoning Attack against Next-Item Recommendationcited by 29
  6. 2024Would Deep Generative Models Amplify Bias in Future Models?cited by 24
  7. 2024Preference Poisoning Attacks on Reward Model Learningcited by 14
  8. 2023Forcing Generative Models to Degenerate Ones: The Power of Data Poisoning Attackscited by 9
  9. 2024Automating Data Annotation under Strategic Human Agents: Risks and Potential Solutionscited by 9
  10. 2023What Distributions are Robust to Indiscriminate Poisoning Attacks for Linear Learners?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops
  2. 2024Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models
  3. 2024Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World
  4. 2024A Note on Shumailov et al. (2024): `AI Models Collapse When Trained on Recursively Generated Data'
  5. 2026From Collapse to Improvement: Statistical Perspectives on the Evolutionary Dynamics of Iterative Training on Contaminated Sources
  6. 2026Effective Synthetic Data Curation Requires Group-Level Signals
  7. 2025Recursive Learning Without Collapse: A Weighting-Based Stabilization Framework
  8. 2025Generative Models for Synthetic Data: Transforming Data Mining in the GenAI Era