mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Observations and Remedies for Large Language Model Bias in Self-Consuming Performative Loop

arXiv 2601.05184 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to growing interest in using synthetic data to train future models. However, this creates a self-consuming retraining loop, where models are trained on their own outputs and may cause performance drops and induce emerging biases. In real-world applications, previously deployed LLMs may influence the data they generate, leading to a dynamic system driven by user feedback. For example, if a model continues to underserve users from a group, less query data will be collected from this particular demographic of users. In this study, we introduce the concept of Self-Consuming Performative Loop (SCPL) and investigate the role of synthetic data in shaping bias during these dynamic iterative training processes under controlled performative feedback. This controlled setting is motivated by the inaccessibility of real-world user preference data from dynamic production systems, and enables us to isolate and analyze feedback-driven bias evolution in a principled manner. We focus on two types of loops, including the typical retraining setting and the incremental fine-tuning setting, which is largely underexplored. Through experiments on three real-world tasks, we find that the performative loop increases preference bias and decreases disparate bias. We design a reward-based rejection sampling strategy to mitigate the bias, moving towards more trustworthy self-improving systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.

Builds on

33 of 52 references.

References · 33

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 401
  6. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
  7. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
  8. 2020Performative Predictioncited by 327
  9. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
  10. 2024OpenMathInstruct-1: A 1.8 Million Math Instruction Tuning Datasetcited by 143
  11. 2024A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Lawscited by 130
  12. 2024A Note on Shumailov et al. (2024): `AI Models Collapse When Trained on Recursively Generated Data'cited by 115
21 more
  1. 2023On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Datacited by 100
  2. 2023The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Textcited by 100
  3. 2024Model Collapse Demystified: The Case of Regressioncited by 82
  4. 2023Large Language Models Suffer From Their Own Output: An Analysis of the Self-Consuming Training Loopcited by 79
  5. 2024How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapsecited by 79
  6. 2022Will Large-scale Generative Models Corrupt Future Datasets?cited by 59
  7. 2024Fairness Feedback Loops: Training on Synthetic Data Amplifies Biascited by 55
  8. 2024Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating Worldcited by 52
  9. 2024Self-Consuming Generative Models with Curated Data Provably Optimize Human Preferencescited by 39
  10. 2024Self-Correcting Self-Consuming Loops for Generative Model Trainingcited by 37
  11. 2024Self-Improving Diffusion Models with Synthetic Datacited by 35
  12. 2022Multi-agent Performative Prediction: From Global Stability and Optimality to Chaoscited by 33
  13. 2023OpinionGPT: Modelling Explicit Biases in Instruction-Tuned LLMscited by 29
  14. 2024Would Deep Generative Models Amplify Bias in Future Models?cited by 24
  15. 2025FastMCTS: A Simple Sampling Strategy for Data Synthesiscited by 17
  16. 2020Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incelscited by 15
  17. 2023Performative Prediction with Bandit Feedback: Learning through Reparameterizationcited by 11
  18. 2025Self-Consuming Generative Models with Adversarially Curated Datacited by 10
  19. 2025DRAGON: Guard LLM Unlearning in Context via Negative Detection and Reasoningcited by 7
  20. 2024Dealing with Synthetic Data Contamination in Online Continual Learningcited by 5
  21. 2025Stabilizing Self-Consuming Diffusion Models with Latent Space Filteringcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.