mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aligning the Query Space: Greedy Information Projection for Language Model Data Selection

arXiv 2603.13790 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data selection for language models is often framed as balancing example quality and diversity. We argue that both are consequences of a more fundamental principle: selected examples should preserve the downstream query space induced by instructions, task signals, or retrieval needs. We present Greedy Information Projection (GIP), a query-aligned method that requires only candidate embeddings and a score signal from LLM judgments, metadata, or intrinsic geometry. GIP greedily selects examples whose embedding span explains the largest residual component of task/query scores, yielding a fast matching-pursuit selector. A Gaussian projection view connects this update to maximizing mutual information, equivalently minimizing the residual volume of the query subspace left unexplained by selected data; this explains how quality and diversity emerge from one objective. Empirically, GIP matches or surpasses full-data fine-tuning using small instruction and reasoning subsets, while pretraining and RAG passage-selection experiments show that the same residual principle transfers beyond supervised fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.

Builds on

39 of 70 references.

References · 39

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  8. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  9. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  11. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  12. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
27 more
  1. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  2. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  3. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  4. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  5. 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
  6. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  7. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  8. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
  9. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
  10. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
  11. 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 527
  12. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  13. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 322
  14. 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
  15. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
  16. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  17. 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 75
  18. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  19. 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 48
  20. 2024DMQR-RAG: Diverse Multi-Query Rewriting for RAGcited by 26
  21. 2021Clustering by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 23
  22. 2025FisherSFT: Data-Efficient Supervised Fine-Tuning of Language Models Using Information Gaincited by 14
  23. 2023Semi-Offline Reinforcement Learning for Optimized Text Generationcited by 12
  24. 2025MIG: Automatic Data Selection for Instruction Tuning by Maximizing Information Gain in Semantic Spacecited by 12
  25. 2022DeepGen: Diverse Search Ad Generation and Real-Time Customizationcited by 10
  26. 2022FAST: Improving Controllability for Text Generation with Feedback Aware Self-Trainingcited by 7
  27. 2013Semi-Supervised Information-Maximization Clusteringcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning
  2. 2026InstructDiff: Domain-Adaptive Data Selection via Differential Entropy for Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning
  3. 2025Fine-tuning Large Language Model for Automated Algorithm Design
  4. 2024How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs
  5. 2025Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoning
  6. 2025Holdout-Loss-Based Data Selection for LLM Finetuning via In-Context Learning
  7. 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
  8. 2026Unified Data Selection for LLM Reasoning