IterSelectTune: An Iterative Training Framework for Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, instruction tuning has become critical for improving their ability to generate accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Although numerous instruction-tuning datasets have been developed to enhance LLM performance, selecting high-quality instruction data from large source datasets typically demands significant human effort. In this work, we introduce IterSelectTune, an efficient, cost-effective iterative training policy for selecting high-quality instruction data with no human involvement and limited reliance on GPT-4. By fine-tuning on approximately 20% of the source data, our method consistently outperforms models fine-tuned on the full dataset across multiple benchmarks and public test datasets. These results highlight the effectiveness of our approach in enhancing LLM performance while reducing the computational resources required for instruction tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.
Builds on
35 of 47 references.
References · 35
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
23 more
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2023WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instructcited by 728
- 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 395
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
- 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
- 2023LaMini-LM: A Diverse Herd of Distilled Models from Large-Scale Instructionscited by 124
- 2020Look at the First Sentence: Position Bias in Question Answeringcited by 83
- 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 57
- 2023Maybe Only 0.5% Data is Needed: A Preliminary Exploration of Low Training Data Instruction Tuningcited by 56
- 2023LongForm: Effective Instruction Tuning with Reverse Instructionscited by 47
- 2023Dynosaur: A Dynamic Growth Paradigm for Instruction-Tuning Data Curationcited by 38
- 2024Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language Modelscited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable Metriccited by 24
- 2025LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 13
- 2025Select2Reason: Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection for Long-CoT Reasoningcited by 7
- 2026Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlookcited by 5
- 2025MergeIT: From Selection to Merging for Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 3
- 2026MADS: Model-Aware Diverse Core Set Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 0
- 2026MADS: Model-Aware Diverse Core Set Selection for Instruction Tuning29 May 2026
- 2026Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlook26 Mar 2026
- 2025Select2Reason: Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection for Long-CoT Reasoning22 May 2025
- 2025LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning12 May 2025
- 2025MergeIT: From Selection to Merging for Efficient Instruction Tuning25 Feb 2025
- 2025Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable Metric24 Feb 2025