QualBench: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs with Localized Professional Qualifications for Vertical Domain Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of Chinese LLMs underscores the need for vertical-domain evaluations to ensure reliable applications. However, existing benchmarks often lack domain coverage and provide limited insights into the Chinese working context. Leveraging qualification exams as a unified framework for expertise evaluation, we introduce QualBench, the first multi-domain Chinese QA benchmark dedicated to localized assessment of Chinese LLMs. The dataset includes over 17,000 questions across six vertical domains, drawn from 24 Chinese qualifications to align with national policies and professional standards. Results reveal an interesting pattern of Chinese LLMs consistently surpassing non-Chinese models, with the Qwen2.5 model outperforming the more advanced GPT-4o, emphasizing the value of localized domain knowledge in meeting qualification requirements. The average accuracy of 53.98% reveals the current gaps in domain coverage within model capabilities. Furthermore, we identify performance degradation caused by LLM crowdsourcing, assess data contamination, and illustrate the effectiveness of prompt engineering and model fine-tuning, suggesting opportunities for future improvements through multi-domain RAG and Federated Learning.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.
Builds on
20 of 46 references.
References · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
- 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
- 2023Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmarkcited by 186
- 2023FederatedScope-LLM: A Comprehensive Package for Fine-tuning Large Language Models in Federated Learningcited by 149
- 2023Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 135
- 2024Rethinking LLM Memorization through the Lens of Adversarial Compressioncited by 94
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models on CMExam -- A Comprehensive Chinese Medical Exam Datasetcited by 91
8 more
- 2023DISC-FinLLM: A Chinese Financial Large Language Model based on Multiple Experts Fine-tuningcited by 64
- 2023FinGPT: Large Generative Models for a Small Languagecited by 49
- 2025Fraud-R1 : A Multi-Round Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of LLM Against Augmented Fraud and Phishing Inducementscited by 32
- 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on CFLUE -- A Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation Datasetcited by 23
- 2025Bridge the Domains: Large Language Models Enhanced Cross-domain Sequential Recommendationcited by 15
- 2024Dial-In LLM: Human-Aligned LLM-in-the-loop Intent Clustering for Customer Service Dialoguescited by 11
- 2024GAOKAO-MM: A Chinese Human-Level Benchmark for Multimodal Models Evaluationcited by 10
- 2025Large Language Models Badly Generalize across Option Length, Problem Types, and Irrelevant Noun Replacementscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Understanding How Value Neurons Shape the Generation of Specified Values in LLMscited by 13
- 2026RAL2M: Retrieval Augmented Learning-To-Match Against Hallucination in Compliance-Guaranteed Service Systemscited by 2
- 2025Contextualized Token Discrimination for Speech Search Query Correctioncited by 1
- 2026Proactive Dialogue Model with Intent Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Meta-Moderator: Empowering Multi-Agent Debate with Meta-Cognitioncited by 0
- 2026Meta-Moderator: Empowering Multi-Agent Debate with Meta-Cognition24 Aug 2026
- 2026Proactive Dialogue Model with Intent Prediction30 Apr 2026
- 2026RAL2M: Retrieval Augmented Learning-To-Match Against Hallucination in Compliance-Guaranteed Service Systems6 Jan 2026
- 2025Contextualized Token Discrimination for Speech Search Query Correction4 Sep 2025
- 2025Understanding How Value Neurons Shape the Generation of Specified Values in LLMs23 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024OpenEval: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs across Capability, Alignment and Safety
- 2025LPFQA: A Long-Tail Professional Forum-based Benchmark for LLM Evaluation
- 2024TestAgent: Automatic Benchmarking and Exploratory Interaction for Evaluating LLMs in Vertical Domains
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models
- 2023TencentLLMEval: A Hierarchical Evaluation of Real-World Capabilities for Human-Aligned LLMs
- 2025SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines
- 2026Xpertbench: Expert Level Tasks with Rubrics-Based Evaluation
- 2025BizFinBench: A Business-Driven Real-World Financial Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs