mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TencentLLMEval: A Hierarchical Evaluation of Real-World Capabilities for Human-Aligned LLMs

arXiv 2311.05374 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across various natural language tasks. However, evaluating their alignment with human preferences remains a challenge. To this end, we propose a comprehensive human evaluation framework to assess LLMs' proficiency in following instructions on diverse real-world tasks. We construct a hierarchical task tree encompassing 7 major areas covering over 200 categories and over 800 tasks, which covers diverse capabilities such as question answering, reasoning, multiturn dialogue, and text generation, to evaluate LLMs in a comprehensive and in-depth manner. We also design detailed evaluation standards and processes to facilitate consistent, unbiased judgments from human evaluators. A test set of over 3,000 instances is released, spanning different difficulty levels and knowledge domains. Our work provides a standardized methodology to evaluate human alignment in LLMs for both English and Chinese. We also analyze the feasibility of automating parts of evaluation with a strong LLM (GPT-4). Our framework supports a thorough assessment of LLMs as they are integrated into real-world applications. We have made publicly available the task tree, TencentLLMEval dataset, and evaluation methodology which have been demonstrated as effective in assessing the performance of Tencent Hunyuan LLMs. By doing so, we aim to facilitate the benchmarking of advances in the development of safe and human-aligned LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  7. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  8. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  9. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  10. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  11. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
  12. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 670
7 more
  1. 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 505
  2. 2023CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinesecited by 449
  3. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
  4. 2023Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmarkcited by 186
  5. 2023Xiezhi: An Ever-Updating Benchmark for Holistic Domain Knowledge Evaluationcited by 52
  6. 2023SuperCLUE: A Comprehensive Chinese Large Language Model Benchmarkcited by 50
  7. 2023CLEVA: Chinese Language Models EVAluation Platformcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025On Evaluating LLM Alignment by Evaluating LLMs as Judges
  2. 2026MILE-RefHumEval: A Reference-Free, Multi-Independent LLM Framework for Human-Aligned Evaluation
  3. 2023Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey
  4. 2023Exploring the Reliability of Large Language Models as Customized Evaluators for Diverse NLP Tasks
  5. 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judges
  6. 2024Sample-Efficient Human Evaluation of Large Language Models via Maximum Discrepancy Competition
  7. 2025A Comprehensive Evaluation framework of Alignment Techniques for LLMs
  8. 2024HD-Eval: Aligning Large Language Model Evaluators Through Hierarchical Criteria Decomposition