Maris: A Formally Verifiable Privacy Policy Enforcement Paradigm for Multi-Agent Collaboration Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent collaboration systems (MACS), powered by large language models (LLMs), solve complex problems efficiently by leveraging each agent's specialization and communication between agents. However, the inherent exchange of information between agents and their interaction with external environments, such as LLM, tools, and users, inevitably introduces significant risks of sensitive data leakage, including vulnerabilities to attacks such as eavesdropping and prompt injection. Existing MACS lack fine-grained data protection controls, making it challenging to manage sensitive information securely. In this paper, we take the first step to mitigate the MACS's data leakage threat through a privacy-enhanced MACS development paradigm, Maris. Maris enables rigorous message flow control within MACS by embedding reference monitors into key multi-agent conversation components. We implemented Maris as an integral part of widely-adopted open-source multi-agent development frameworks, AutoGen and LangChain. To evaluate its effectiveness, we develop a Privacy Assessment Framework that emulates MACS under different threat scenarios. Our evaluation shows that Maris effectively mitigated sensitive data leakage threats across three different task suites while maintaining a high task success rate.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025ShieldAgent: Shielding Agents via Verifiable Safety Policy Reasoning26 Mar
- 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Design24 Mar
- 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents24 Mar
- 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents19 Jun
- 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May
- 2024IsolateGPT: An Execution Isolation Architecture for LLM-Based Agentic Systems8 Mar
- 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents5 Mar
Other references · 7
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
- 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
- 2024FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision Makingcited by 112
- 2024System-Level Defense against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks: An Information Flow Control Perspectivecited by 91
- 2023Large Language Models for Supply Chain Optimizationcited by 61
- 2023Large Language Model Enhanced Multi-Agent Systems for 6G Communicationscited by 53
- 2025ACE: A Security Architecture for LLM-Integrated App Systemscited by 52
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2026A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypescited by 19
- 2025Security Analysis of Agentic AI Communication Protocols: A Comparative Evaluationcited by 6
- 2026PrivAct: Internalizing Contextual Privacy Preservation via Multi-Agent Preference Trainingcited by 6
- 2026Lingering Authority: Revocable Resource-and-Effect Capabilities for Coding Agentscited by 5
- 2025GAMA: A General Anonymizing Multi-Agent System for Privacy Preservation Enhanced by Domain Rules and Disproof Mechanismcited by 2
- 2026Don't Make Models Guess Security and Safety: Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific AI Agentscited by 1
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systemscited by 1
- 2026MNC: Scope-Bound Semantic Declassification for Private LLM-Agent Communicationcited by 0
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems1 Sep 2026
- 2026MNC: Scope-Bound Semantic Declassification for Private LLM-Agent Communication3 Aug 2026
- 2026Lingering Authority: Revocable Resource-and-Effect Capabilities for Coding Agents21 Jun 2026
- 2026Don't Make Models Guess Security and Safety: Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific AI Agents16 Apr 2026
- 2026PrivAct: Internalizing Contextual Privacy Preservation via Multi-Agent Preference Training14 Feb 2026
- 2026A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypes8 Jan 2026
- 2025Security Analysis of Agentic AI Communication Protocols: A Comparative Evaluation5 Nov 2025
- 2025GAMA: A General Anonymizing Multi-Agent System for Privacy Preservation Enhanced by Domain Rules and Disproof Mechanism12 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents
- 2025The Sum Leaks More Than Its Parts: Compositional Privacy Risks and Mitigations in Multi-Agent Collaboration
- 2026Multi-Agent Firewall Architecture for Privacy Protection of Sensitive Data in Interactions with Language Models
- 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2025Terrarium: Revisiting the Blackboard for Multi-Agent Safety, Privacy, and Security Studies
- 2026Information-Theoretic Privacy Control for Sequential Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2025Privacy-R1: Privacy-Aware Multi-LLM Agent Collaboration via Reinforcement Learning