mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Information-Theoretic Privacy Control for Sequential Multi-Agent LLM Systems

arXiv 2603.05520 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2026cs.MA cs.CR cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequential multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems are increasingly deployed in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and enterprise decision-making, where multiple specialized agents collaboratively process a single user request. Although individual agents may satisfy local privacy constraints, sensitive information can still be inferred through sequential composition and intermediate representations. In this work, we study compositional privacy leakage in sequential LLM agent pipelines. We formalize leakage using mutual information and derive a theoretical bound that characterizes how locally introduced leakage can amplify across agents under sequential execution. Motivated by this analysis, we propose a privacy-regularized training framework that directly constrains information flow between agent outputs and agent-local sensitive variables. We evaluate our approach across sequential agent pipelines of varying depth on three benchmark datasets, demonstrating stable optimization dynamics and consistent, interpretable privacy-utility trade-offs. Our results show that privacy in agentic LLM systems cannot be guaranteed by local constraints alone and must instead be treated as a system-level property during both training and deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025MemoryGraft: Persistent Compromise of LLM Agents via Poisoned Experience Retrieval18 Dec
  2. 2025ConVerse: Benchmarking Contextual Safety in Agent-to-Agent Conversations7 Nov
  3. 2025The Sum Leaks More Than Its Parts: Compositional Privacy Risks and Mitigations in Multi-Agent Collaboration16 Sep
  4. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning11 Aug
  5. 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul
  6. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May

Other references · 19

  1. 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
  2. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  3. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
  4. 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 552
  5. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
  6. 2024Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gymcited by 300
  7. 2024TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Frameworkcited by 182
  8. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 161
  9. 2025APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplaycited by 158
  10. 2025AgentNet: Decentralized Evolutionary Coordination for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 86
  11. 2024SoK: Membership Inference Attacks on LLMs are Rushing Nowhere (and How to Fix It)cited by 54
  12. 2025Towards Enterprise-Ready Computer Using Generalist Agentcited by 31
7 more
  1. 2024Large Language Models are Advanced Anonymizerscited by 22
  2. 2025AgentBreeder: Mitigating the AI Safety Risks of Multi-Agent Scaffolds via Self-Improvementcited by 13
  3. 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacycited by 11
  4. 2025Positional Fragility in LLMs: How Offset Effects Reshape Our Understanding of Memorization Riskscited by 2
  5. 2025What Really is a Member? Discrediting Membership Inference via Poisoningcited by 2
  6. 2025Effective Policy Learning for Multi-Agent Online Coordination Beyond Submodular Objectivescited by 2
  7. 2026Generative AI Agents for Controllable and Protected Content Creationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  2. 2025Privacy-R1: Privacy-Aware Multi-LLM Agent Collaboration via Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Confuse the Model, Control the Flow: Understanding and Mitigating Privacy Leakage from LLM Agents with Information Flow Control
  4. 2026Differential Privacy in Generative AI Agents: Analysis and Optimal Tradeoffs
  5. 2024LeakAgent: RL-based Red-teaming Agent for LLM Privacy Leakage
  6. 2026Got a Secret? LLM Agents Can't Keep It: Evaluating Privacy in Multi-Agent Systems
  7. 2026PrivAct: Internalizing Contextual Privacy Preservation via Multi-Agent Preference Training
  8. 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies