mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification from the Perspective of the Frequency Domain

arXiv 2505.01267 ↗First posted 2 May 2025cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The diffusion-based adversarial purification methods attempt to drown adversarial perturbations into a part of isotropic noise through the forward process, and then recover the clean images through the reverse process. Due to the lack of distribution information about adversarial perturbations in the pixel domain, it is often unavoidable to damage normal semantics. We turn to the frequency domain perspective, decomposing the image into amplitude spectrum and phase spectrum. We find that for both spectra, the damage caused by adversarial perturbations tends to increase monotonically with frequency. This means that we can extract the content and structural information of the original clean sample from the frequency components that are less damaged. Meanwhile, theoretical analysis indicates that existing purification methods indiscriminately damage all frequency components, leading to excessive damage to the image. Therefore, we propose a purification method that can eliminate adversarial perturbations while maximizing the preservation of the content and structure of the original image. Specifically, at each time step during the reverse process, for the amplitude spectrum, we replace the low-frequency components of the estimated image's amplitude spectrum with the corresponding parts of the adversarial image. For the phase spectrum, we project the phase of the estimated image into a designated range of the adversarial image's phase spectrum, focusing on the low frequencies. Empirical evidence from extensive experiments demonstrates that our method significantly outperforms most current defense methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2025.

Builds on

46 of 54 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  8. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  9. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  10. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  11. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  12. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
34 more
  1. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  2. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  3. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  4. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  5. 2022Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Denoising Diffusion Null-Space Modelcited by 583
  6. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
  7. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
  8. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  9. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
  10. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  11. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
  12. 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 244
  13. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 234
  14. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 204
  15. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
  16. 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
  17. 2021Adversarial purification with Score-based generative modelscited by 134
  18. 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 111
  19. 2022Guided Diffusion Model for Adversarial Purificationcited by 92
  20. 2023Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Modelscited by 79
  21. 2020Adaptive Checkpoint Adjoint Method for Gradient Estimation in Neural ODEcited by 76
  22. 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
  23. 2019ME-Net: Towards Effective Adversarial Robustness with Matrix Estimationcited by 65
  24. 2023Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 65
  25. 2020Stochastic Security: Adversarial Defense Using Long-Run Dynamics of Energy-Based Modelscited by 58
  26. 2024Revisiting Adversarial Training at Scalecited by 33
  27. 2021A Frequency Perspective of Adversarial Robustnesscited by 28
  28. 2023Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New Directionscited by 28
  29. 2021Towards Defending against Adversarial Examples via Attack-Invariant Featurescited by 25
  30. 2023MimicDiffusion: Purifying Adversarial Perturbation via Mimicking Clean Diffusion Modelcited by 18
  31. 2024Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP): Advancing Both Robustness and Generalizationcited by 15
  32. 2024LoRID: Low-Rank Iterative Diffusion for Adversarial Purificationcited by 7
  33. 2024Robust Overfitting Does Matter: Test-Time Adversarial Purification With FGSMcited by 6
  34. 2024Exploring Query Efficient Data Generation towards Data-free Model Stealing in Hard Label Settingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.