mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Overfitting Does Matter: Test-Time Adversarial Purification With FGSM

arXiv 2403.11448 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous studies have demonstrated the susceptibility of deep neural networks (DNNs) to subtle adversarial perturbations, prompting the development of many advanced adversarial defense methods aimed at mitigating adversarial attacks. Current defense strategies usually train DNNs for a specific adversarial attack method and can achieve good robustness in defense against this type of adversarial attack. Nevertheless, when subjected to evaluations involving unfamiliar attack modalities, empirical evidence reveals a pronounced deterioration in the robustness of DNNs. Meanwhile, there is a trade-off between the classification accuracy of clean examples and adversarial examples. Most defense methods often sacrifice the accuracy of clean examples in order to improve the adversarial robustness of DNNs. To alleviate these problems and enhance the overall robust generalization of DNNs, we propose the Test-Time Pixel-Level Adversarial Purification (TPAP) method. This approach is based on the robust overfitting characteristic of DNNs to the fast gradient sign method (FGSM) on training and test datasets. It utilizes FGSM for adversarial purification, to process images for purifying unknown adversarial perturbations from pixels at testing time in a "counter changes with changelessness" manner, thereby enhancing the defense capability of DNNs against various unknown adversarial attacks. Extensive experimental results show that our method can effectively improve both overall robust generalization of DNNs, notably over previous methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

43 of 61 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  7. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  9. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  10. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  11. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  12. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
31 more
  1. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  2. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  3. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  4. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
  5. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
  6. 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 442
  7. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  8. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  9. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  10. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
  11. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 208
  12. 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
  13. 2018Decoupling Direction and Norm for Efficient Gradient-Based L2 Adversarial Attacks and Defensescited by 109
  14. 2022Guided Diffusion Model for Adversarial Purificationcited by 92
  15. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 76
  16. 2019ME-Net: Towards Effective Adversarial Robustness with Matrix Estimationcited by 65
  17. 2020Guided Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Enhancing Adversarial Defensescited by 62
  18. 2020Stochastic Security: Adversarial Defense Using Long-Run Dynamics of Energy-Based Modelscited by 58
  19. 2023CFA: Class-wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 53
  20. 2017Defense against Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 48
  21. 2020Dual Manifold Adversarial Robustness: Defense against Lp and non-Lp Adversarial Attackscited by 45
  22. 2021Subspace Adversarial Trainingcited by 41
  23. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Decision Boundary Dynamics for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 36
  24. 2023Improving Fast Adversarial Training with Prior-Guided Knowledgecited by 35
  25. 2020Towards Understanding Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 33
  26. 2019PuVAE: A Variational Autoencoder to Purify Adversarial Examplescited by 28
  27. 2020Stronger and Faster Wasserstein Adversarial Attackscited by 25
  28. 2021Towards Defending against Adversarial Examples via Attack-Invariant Featurescited by 25
  29. 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Adaptive Step Sizecited by 25
  30. 2021Removing Adversarial Noise in Class Activation Feature Spacecited by 18
  31. 2020Ensemble Generative Cleaning with Feedback Loops for Defending Adversarial Attackscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5.

6 papers.