mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework

arXiv 2504.14928 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2025cs.AI cs.CE cs.CLcited by 23

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as educational tools, yet evaluating their teaching capabilities remains challenging due to the resource-intensive, context-dependent, and methodologically complex nature of teacher-student interactions. We introduce EducationQ, a multi-agent dialogue framework that efficiently assesses teaching capabilities through simulated dynamic educational scenarios, featuring specialized agents for teaching, learning, and evaluation. Testing 14 LLMs across major AI Organizations (OpenAI, Meta, Google, Anthropic, and others) on 1,498 questions spanning 13 disciplines and 10 difficulty levels reveals that teaching effectiveness does not correlate linearly with model scale or general reasoning capabilities - with some smaller open-source models outperforming larger commercial counterparts in teaching contexts. This finding highlights a critical gap in current evaluations that prioritize knowledge recall over interactive pedagogy. Our mixed-methods evaluation, combining quantitative metrics with qualitative analysis and expert case studies, identifies distinct pedagogical strengths employed by top-performing models (e.g., sophisticated questioning strategies, adaptive feedback mechanisms). Human expert evaluations show 78% agreement with our automated qualitative analysis of effective teaching behaviors, validating our methodology. EducationQ demonstrates that LLMs-as-teachers require specialized optimization beyond simple scaling, suggesting next-generation educational AI prioritize targeted enhancement of specific pedagogical effectiveness.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.

Builds on

18 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024TeachTune: Reviewing Pedagogical Agents Against Diverse Student Profiles with Simulated Students5 Oct
  2. 2024PeerGPT: Probing the Roles of LLM-based Peer Agents as Team Moderators and Participants in Children's Collaborative Learning21 Mar

Other references · 16

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  4. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  8. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  9. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  10. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
  11. 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 73
  12. 2024Generative Students: Using LLM-Simulated Student Profiles to Support Question Item Evaluationcited by 56
4 more
  1. 2022Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word Problemscited by 42
  2. 2024A Chain-of-Thought Prompting Approach with LLMs for Evaluating Students' Formative Assessment Responses in Sciencecited by 31
  3. 2024MathChat: Benchmarking Mathematical Reasoning and Instruction Following in Multi-Turn Interactionscited by 26
  4. 2023Leveraging generative artificial intelligence to simulate student learning behaviorcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 16.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025EduBench: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Diverse Educational Scenarioscited by 16
  2. 2026EduEVAL-DB: A Role-Based Dataset for Pedagogical Risk Evaluation in Educational Explanationscited by 4
  3. 2025Shaping Explanations: Semantic Reward Modeling with Encoder-Only Transformers for GRPOcited by 2
  4. 2025From Correctness to Collaboration: Toward a Human-Centered Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Behavior in Software Engineeringcited by 2
  5. 2026When Verification Hurts: Asymmetric Effects of Multi-Agent Feedback in Logic Proof Tutoringcited by 2
  6. 2026AIriskEval-edu: New Dataset for Risk Assessment in AI-mediated K-12 Educational Explanationscited by 2
  7. 2025Exploring Conversational Design Choices in LLMs for Pedagogical Purposes: Socratic and Narrative Approaches for Improving Instructor's Teaching Practicecited by 1
  8. 2026Confirming Correct, Missing the Rest: LLM Tutoring Agents Struggle Where Feedback Matters Mostcited by 1
  9. 2026The Deliberative Illusion: Diagnosing Factual Attrition and Stance Homogenization in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberationcited by 1
  10. 2025OnlineMate: An LLM-Based Multi-Agent Companion System for Cognitive Support in Online Learningcited by 0
  11. 2025CGF-DETR: Cross-Gated Fusion DETR for Enhanced Pneumonia Detection in Chest X-rayscited by 0
  12. 2025CogEvo-Edu: Cognitive Evolution Educational Multi-Agent Collaborative Systemcited by 0
11 more
  1. 2026OpenLearnLM Benchmark: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Knowledge, Skill, and Attitude in Educational Large Language Modelscited by 0
  2. 2026TeachBench: A Syllabus-Grounded Framework for Evaluating Teaching Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 0
  3. 2026TeachingCoach: A Fine-Tuned Scaffolding Chatbot for Instructional Guidance to Instructorscited by 0
  4. 2026Evaluating Epistemic Guardrails in AI Reading Assistants: A Behavioral Audit of a Minimal Prototypecited by 0
  5. 2026Agentic AI Ecosystems in Higher Education: A Perspective on AI Agents to Emerging Inclusive, Agentic Multi-Agent AI Framework for Learning, Teaching and Institutional Intelligencecited by 0
  6. 2026PEARL: Training Socratic Tutors with Pedagogically Aligned Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  7. 2026Lect=uraAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework for Adaptive Personalized AI-Assisted Learning and Embodied Teachingcited by 0
  8. 2026The Energy Society: A Simulation Environment for Studying Agent Cooperation under Survival Pressurecited by 0
  9. 2026ELBench: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Education-Facing Large Language Modelscited by 0
  10. 2026SLATE: Are AI-Generated Slides Educationally Effective? A Benchmark for Language Teaching Quality and Learner Knowledge Acquisitioncited by 0
  11. 2026From Content Generation to Learning Support: Pedagogy-Guided Generative Video Tutors for STEM Learningcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Conversational Education at Scale: A Multi-LLM Agent Workflow for Procedural Learning and Pedagogic Quality Assessment
  2. 2025LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applications
  3. 2026A Scoping Review of Large Language Model-Based Pedagogical Agents
  4. 2025Dialogic Pedagogy for Large Language Models: Aligning Conversational AI with Proven Theories of Learning
  5. 2025Simulating Students with Large Language Models: A Review of Architecture, Mechanisms, and Role Modelling in Education with Generative AI
  6. 2025A Theory of Adaptive Scaffolding for LLM-Based Pedagogical Agents
  7. 2026Elmes*: Automated Construction of Fine-Grained Evaluation Rubrics for Large Language Models in Long-Tail Educational Scenarios
  8. 2025CoDAE: Adapting Large Language Models for Education via Chain-of-Thought Data Augmentation