mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AIriskEval-edu: New Dataset for Risk Assessment in AI-mediated K-12 Educational Explanations

arXiv 2607.01934 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.DBcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work introduces AIriskEval-edu-db2, a new dataset designed to train and evaluate auditors based on LLMs for an explainable pedagogical risk assessment in instructional content for grades K-12. The dataset comprises 1,639 explanations from 170 curated ScienceQA questions, covering science, language arts, and social sciences. For each question, the dataset includes an explanation written by a human teacher alongside 11 explanations generated by LLM-simulated teacher profiles associated with distinct pedagogical risks. We propose a comprehensive risk rubric aligned with established educational standards that covers five complementary dimensions: factual precision, depth and completeness, focus and relevance, student-level appropriateness, and ideological bias. A key contribution is the addition of 785 explanations with structured explainability annotations, including risk localization and risk description. The annotations are produced through a semi-automatic process with expert teacher validation. Finally, we present validation experiments comparing state-of-the-art proprietary models with a lightweight local Llama 3.1 8B model in both the pedagogical risk detection and the explainability assessment. These experiments evaluate whether supervised fine-tuning on AIriskEval-edu-db2 enables a locally deployable model to approach or outperform stronger frontier models while preserving privacy in educational auditing and assessment tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 33 references.

References · 18

  1. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  2. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
  3. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
  4. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
  5. 2023MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problemscited by 128
  6. 2024Unifying AI Tutor Evaluation: An Evaluation Taxonomy for Pedagogical Ability Assessment of LLM-Powered AI Tutorscited by 60
  7. 2024LLMs are Biased Teachers: Evaluating LLM Bias in Personalized Educationcited by 28
  8. 2025EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Frameworkcited by 23
  9. 2022edBB-Demo: Biometrics and Behavior Analysis for Online Educational Platformscited by 18
  10. 2025Findings of the BEA 2025 Shared Task on Pedagogical Ability Assessment of AI-powered Tutorscited by 16
  11. 2024Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teachingcited by 14
  12. 2024E-EVAL: A Comprehensive Chinese K-12 Education Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 13
6 more
  1. 2025Addressing Bias in LLMs: Strategies and Application to Fair AI-based Recruitmentcited by 12
  2. 2024Biometrics and Behavior Analysis for Detecting Distractions in e-Learningcited by 10
  3. 2025AI-based Multimodal Biometrics for Detecting Smartphone Distractions: Application to Online Learningcited by 6
  4. 2026Is My Vision-Language Data in Your AI? Membership Inference Test (MINT) Demo 2cited by 6
  5. 2026EduEVAL-DB: A Role-Based Dataset for Pedagogical Risk Evaluation in Educational Explanationscited by 4
  6. 2026Evaluating Social Engineering Risks in AI-based Interaction using Biometrics and a Gaming Setupcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.