Dialogic Pedagogy for Large Language Models: Aligning Conversational AI with Proven Theories of Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming education by enabling rich conversational learning experiences. This article provides a comprehensive review of how LLM-based conversational agents are being used in higher education, with extensions to secondary and lifelong learning contexts. We synthesize existing literature on LLMs in education and theories of conversational and dialogic pedagogy - including Vygotsky's sociocultural learning (scaffolding and the Zone of Proximal Development), the Socratic method, and Laurillard's conversational framework - and examine how prompting strategies and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can align LLM behaviors with these pedagogical theories, and how it can support personalized, adaptive learning. We map educational theories to LLM capabilities, highlighting where LLM-driven dialogue supports established learning principles and where it challenges or falls short of traditional pedagogical assumptions. Notable gaps in applying prior theories to LLMs are identified, such as the models tendency to provide direct answers instead of fostering co-construction of knowledge, and the need to account for the constant availability and broad but non-human expertise of LLM tutors. In response, we propose practical strategies to better align LLM interactions with sound pedagogy - for example, designing prompts that encourage Socratic questioning, scaffolded guidance, and student reflection, as well as integrating retrieval mechanisms to ensure accuracy and contextual relevance. Our aim is to bridge the gap between educational theory and the emerging practice of AI-driven conversational learning, offering insights and tools for making LLM-based dialogues more educationally productive and theory-aligned.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.
Builds on
7 of 36 references.
References · 7
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 431
- 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 191
- 2022Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generationcited by 99
- 2023Prompting Large Language Models With the Socratic Methodcited by 43
- 2023How to Teach Programming in the AI Era? Using LLMs as a Teachable Agent for Debuggingcited by 30
- 2023AI Chatbots as Multi-Role Pedagogical Agents: Transforming Engagement in CS Educationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Simulating Students with Large Language Models: A Review of Architecture, Mechanisms, and Role Modelling in Education with Generative AI
- 2025EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework
- 2026Hybrid LLM-Embedded Dialogue Agents for Learner Reflection: Designing Responsive and Theory-Driven Interactions
- 2023The Use of Multiple Conversational Agent Interlocutors in Learning
- 2025LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applications
- 2026Large Language Models in Teaching and Learning: Reflections on Implementing an AI Chatbot in Higher Education ↗
- 2025CoDAE: Adapting Large Language Models for Education via Chain-of-Thought Data Augmentation
- 2026A Scoping Review of Large Language Model-Based Pedagogical Agents