STAMP Your Content: Proving Dataset Membership via Watermarked Rephrasings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given how large parts of publicly available text are crawled to pretrain large language models (LLMs), data creators increasingly worry about the inclusion of their proprietary data for model training without attribution or licensing. Their concerns are also shared by benchmark curators whose test-sets might be compromised. In this paper, we present STAMP, a framework for detecting dataset membership-i.e., determining the inclusion of a dataset in the pretraining corpora of LLMs. Given an original piece of content, our proposal involves first generating multiple rephrases, each embedding a watermark with a unique secret key. One version is to be released publicly, while others are to be kept private. Subsequently, creators can compare model likelihoods between public and private versions using paired statistical tests to prove membership. We show that our framework can successfully detect contamination across four benchmarks which appear only once in the training data and constitute less than 0.001% of the total tokens, outperforming several contamination detection and dataset inference baselines. We verify that STAMP preserves both the semantic meaning and utility of the original data. We apply STAMP to two real-world scenarios to confirm the inclusion of paper abstracts and blog articles in the pretraining corpora.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.
Builds on
41 of 58 references.
References · 41
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 375
29 more
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 339
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 251
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 234
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 227
- 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?cited by 188
- 2023Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Modelscited by 175
- 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
- 2023Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 139
- 2023What's In My Big Data?cited by 129
- 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 115
- 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 107
- 2024Min-K%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 102
- 2024Blind Baselines Beat Membership Inference Attacks for Foundation Modelscited by 65
- 2024SoK: Membership Inference Attacks on LLMs are Rushing Nowhere (and How to Fix It)cited by 54
- 2024Pretraining Data Detection for Large Language Models: A Divergence-based Calibration Methodcited by 54
- 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactivecited by 52
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks Cannot Prove that a Model Was Trained On Your Datacited by 49
- 2022Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literaturecited by 45
- 2024Proving membership in LLM pretraining data via data watermarkscited by 38
- 2024Copyright Traps for Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2024Evaluation data contamination in LLMs: how do we measure it and (when) does it matter?cited by 30
- 2023Watermarking Text Data on Large Language Models for Dataset Copyrightcited by 24
- 2024"A good pun is its own reword": Can Large Language Models Understand Puns?cited by 21
- 2021Paraphrastic Representations at Scalecited by 19
- 2024Waterfall: Framework for Robust and Scalable Text Watermarking and Provenance for LLMscited by 14
- 2023Characterizing Large Language Models as Rationalizers of Knowledge-intensive Taskscited by 9
- 2025Detecting Benchmark Contamination Through Watermarkingcited by 6
- 2024PaCoST: Paired Confidence Significance Testing for Benchmark Contamination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2024Tree of Problems: Improving structured problem solving with compositionalitycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025Leave No TRACE: Black-box Detection of Copyrighted Dataset Usage in Large Language Models via Watermarkingcited by 5
- 2025Data Provenance Auditing of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models with a Text-Preserving Techniquecited by 3
- 2025How Good is Post-Hoc Watermarking With Language Model Rephrasing?cited by 2
- 2026Latent-Mark: An Audio Watermark Robust to Neural Codec Compressioncited by 1
- 2025RECAP: Reproducing Copyrighted Data from LLMs Training with an Agentic Pipelinecited by 0
- 2025Perturb Your Data: Paraphrase-Guided Training Data Watermarkingcited by 0
- 2026Detecting Non-Membership in LLM Training Data via Rank Correlationscited by 0
- 2026Dataset Watermarking with Provable Black-Box Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Dataset Watermarking with Provable Black-Box Detection7 May 2026
- 2026Detecting Non-Membership in LLM Training Data via Rank Correlations24 Mar 2026
- 2026Latent-Mark: An Audio Watermark Robust to Neural Codec Compression5 Mar 2026
- 2025Perturb Your Data: Paraphrase-Guided Training Data Watermarking18 Dec 2025
- 2025How Good is Post-Hoc Watermarking With Language Model Rephrasing?18 Dec 2025
- 2025RECAP: Reproducing Copyrighted Data from LLMs Training with an Agentic Pipeline29 Oct 2025
- 2025Data Provenance Auditing of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models with a Text-Preserving Technique7 Oct 2025
- 2025Leave No TRACE: Black-box Detection of Copyrighted Dataset Usage in Large Language Models via Watermarking3 Oct 2025