mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PaCoST: Paired Confidence Significance Testing for Benchmark Contamination Detection in Large Language Models

arXiv 2406.18326 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are known to be trained on vast amounts of data, which may unintentionally or intentionally include data from commonly used benchmarks. This inclusion can lead to cheatingly high scores on model leaderboards, yet result in disappointing performance in real-world applications. To address this benchmark contamination problem, we first propose a set of requirements that practical contamination detection methods should follow. Following these proposed requirements, we introduce PaCoST, a Paired Confidence Significance Testing to effectively detect benchmark contamination in LLMs. Our method constructs a counterpart for each piece of data with the same distribution, and performs statistical analysis of the corresponding confidence to test whether the model is significantly more confident under the original benchmark. We validate the effectiveness of PaCoST and apply it on popular open-source models and benchmarks. We find that almost all models and benchmarks we tested are suspected contaminated more or less. We finally call for new LLM evaluation methods.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 56 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  9. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  10. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  11. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  12. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
18 more
  1. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  2. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  3. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
  4. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
  5. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
  6. 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 706
  7. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  8. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
  9. 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 339
  10. 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
  11. 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 227
  12. 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
  13. 2023Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samplescited by 192
  14. 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmeticcited by 188
  15. 2022Quantifying Privacy Risks of Masked Language Models Using Membership Inference Attackscited by 168
  16. 2023Knowing What LLMs DO NOT Know: A Simple Yet Effective Self-Detection Methodcited by 51
  17. 2023Estimating Contamination via Perplexity: Quantifying Memorisation in Language Model Evaluationcited by 47
  18. 2021Membership Inference on Word Embedding and Beyondcited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.