mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Perturb Your Data: Paraphrase-Guided Training Data Watermarking

arXiv 2512.17075 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training data detection is critical for enforcing copyright and data licensing, as Large Language Models (LLM) are trained on massive text corpora scraped from the internet. We present SPECTRA, a watermarking approach that makes training data reliably detectable even when it comprises less than 0.001% of the training corpus. SPECTRA works by paraphrasing text using an LLM and assigning a score based on how likely each paraphrase is, according to a separate scoring model. A paraphrase is chosen so that its score closely matches that of the original text, to avoid introducing any distribution shifts. To test whether a suspect model has been trained on the watermarked data, we compare its token probabilities against those of the scoring model. We demonstrate that SPECTRA achieves a consistent p-value gap of over nine orders of magnitude when detecting data used for training versus data not used for training, which is greater than all baselines tested. SPECTRA equips data owners with a scalable, deploy-before-release watermark that survives even large-scale LLM training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  4. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
  5. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  6. 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 227
  7. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 107
  8. 2024Blind Baselines Beat Membership Inference Attacks for Foundation Modelscited by 65
  9. 2023Scalable Membership Inference Attacks via Quantile Regressioncited by 61
  10. 2024Pretraining Data Detection for Large Language Models: A Divergence-based Calibration Methodcited by 54
  11. 2023Paloma: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Model Fitcited by 53
  12. 2022BITE: Textual Backdoor Attacks with Iterative Trigger Injectioncited by 47
9 more
  1. 2024Proving membership in LLM pretraining data via data watermarkscited by 38
  2. 2025The Common Pile v0.1: An 8TB Dataset of Public Domain and Openly Licensed Textcited by 25
  3. 2024Can Watermarking Large Language Models Prevent Copyrighted Text Generation and Hide Training Data?cited by 15
  4. 2024Fine-Tuning Language Models with Differential Privacy through Adaptive Noise Allocationcited by 14
  5. 2022Towards a consistent interpretation of AIOps modelscited by 8
  6. 2025STAMP Your Content: Proving Dataset Membership via Watermarked Rephrasingscited by 8
  7. 2025Unlocking Post-hoc Dataset Inference with Synthetic Datacited by 7
  8. 2025Winter Soldier: Backdooring Language Models at Pre-Training with Indirect Data Poisoningcited by 6
  9. 2025Beyond Public Access in LLM Pre-Training Datacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.