mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting Non-Membership in LLM Training Data via Rank Correlations

arXiv 2603.22707 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) are trained on increasingly vast and opaque text corpora, determining which data contributed to training has become essential for copyright enforcement, compliance auditing, and user trust. While prior work focuses on detecting whether a dataset was used in training (membership inference), the complementary problem -- verifying that a dataset was not used -- has received little attention. We address this gap by introducing PRISM, a test that detects dataset-level non-membership using only grey-box access to model logits. Our key insight is that two models that have not seen a dataset exhibit higher rank correlation in their normalized token log probabilities than when one model has been trained on that data. Using this observation, we construct a correlation-based test that detects non-membership. Empirically, PRISM reliably rules out membership in training data across all datasets tested while avoiding false positives, thus offering a framework for verifying that specific datasets were excluded from LLM training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

18 of 39 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
  6. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
  7. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 153
  8. 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
  9. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 107
  10. 2024Blind Baselines Beat Membership Inference Attacks for Foundation Modelscited by 65
  11. 2024Towards Cross-Tokenizer Distillation: the Universal Logit Distillation Loss for LLMscited by 61
  12. 2024Pretraining Data Detection for Large Language Models: A Divergence-based Calibration Methodcited by 54
6 more
  1. 2023Paloma: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Model Fitcited by 53
  2. 2025The Common Pile v0.1: An 8TB Dataset of Public Domain and Openly Licensed Textcited by 25
  3. 2025Enhancing Cross-Tokenizer Knowledge Distillation with Contextual Dynamical Mappingcited by 10
  4. 2025STAMP Your Content: Proving Dataset Membership via Watermarked Rephrasingscited by 8
  5. 2025Unlocking Post-hoc Dataset Inference with Synthetic Datacited by 7
  6. 2025CoCoLex: Confidence-guided Copy-based Decoding for Grounded Legal Text Generationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.