mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ctrl-Z: Controlling AI Agents via Resampling

arXiv 2504.10374 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Control evaluations measure whether monitoring and security protocols for AI systems prevent intentionally subversive AI models from causing harm. Our work presents the first control evaluation performed in an agent environment. We construct BashBench, a dataset of 257 challenging multi-step system administration tasks, and evaluate whether various safety measures can prevent an adversarially constructed AI agent from covertly downloading and executing malicious code in this environment. This multi-step setting introduces new attack and defense dynamics, which we investigate in order to design novel control protocols that prevent safety failures without hindering the ability of non-malicious agents to perform useful work. We introduce a class of control protocols called resample protocols that dynamically take additional samples of certain actions. We find these protocols significantly improve on existing techniques by selectively blocking the AI agent from executing suspicious code and incriminating the agent by generating additional examples of dangerous behavior. We measure the tradeoff between attack prevention and usefulness; our best protocol combines resampling with analysis of previous steps, reducing the success rate of attacks from 58% to 7% at a 5% cost to the performance of a non-malicious agent.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2025.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  5. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  6. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  7. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  8. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  9. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
  10. 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
  11. 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 316
  12. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
9 more
  1. 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 212
  2. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 207
  3. 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 153
  4. 2023Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systemscited by 134
  5. 2023Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?cited by 90
  6. 2022Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspectivecited by 41
  7. 2024Games for AI Control: Models of Safety Evaluations of AI Deployment Protocolscited by 28
  8. 2024Adaptive Deployment of Untrusted LLMs Reduces Distributed Threatscited by 27
  9. 2019A Research Agenda: Dynamic Models to Defend Against Correlated Attackscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 13; 2026: 27.

40 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agentscited by 58
  2. 2025Reliable Weak-to-Strong Monitoring of LLM Agentscited by 24
  3. 2025Reasoning Models Sometimes Output Illegible Chains of Thoughtcited by 9
  4. 2025Evaluating Control Protocols for Untrusted AI Agentscited by 9
  5. 2025Control Tax: The Price of Keeping AI in Checkcited by 7
  6. 2026Agentic Uncertainty Reveals Agentic Overconfidencecited by 7
  7. 2025Optimizing AI Agent Attacks With Synthetic Datacited by 6
  8. 2025Practical challenges of control monitoring in frontier AI deploymentscited by 6
  9. 2026LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environmentscited by 6
  10. 2026Ensemble Monitoring for AI Control: Diverse Signals Outweigh More Computecited by 5
  11. 2026MonitoringBench: Semi-Automated Red-Teaming for Agent Monitoringcited by 4
  12. 2025Calibrated Predictive Lower Bounds on Time-to-Unsafe-Sampling in LLMscited by 3
28 more
  1. 2025Subversion via Focal Points: Investigating Collusion in LLM Monitoringcited by 3
  2. 2025Localized Calibrated Uncertainty in Code Language Modelscited by 3
  3. 2026Basic Legibility Protocols Improve Trusted Monitoringcited by 3
  4. 2026Training Agents to Self-Report Misbehaviorcited by 3
  5. 2026Distributed Attacks in Persistent-State AI Controlcited by 3
  6. 2025Against racing to AGI: Cooperation, deterrence, and catastrophic riskscited by 2
  7. 2026Chain-of-thought obfuscation learned from output supervision can generalise to unseen taskscited by 2
  8. 2026Retrying vs Resampling in AI Controlcited by 1
  9. 2026Attack Selection in Agentic AI Control Evaluations Meaningfully Decreases Safetycited by 1
  10. 2026CIAware-Bench: Benchmarking Control Intervention Awareness Across Frontier LLMscited by 1
  11. 2026ResearchArena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in Automated AI R&Dcited by 1
  12. 2026trajectory-judge: What Outcome-Only LLM Judges Miss on Agent Trajectoriescited by 1
  13. 2026Reliability Theory for AI Controlcited by 1
  14. 2026Covert Assistance: Helpful LLM Agents Evade Oversight in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
  15. 2026Groundability, Not Scale Alone: When Weak Reviewers Can Audit Strong Coding Agentscited by 1
  16. 2025The Double Life of Code World Models: Provably Unmasking Malicious Behavior Through Execution Tracescited by 0
  17. 2025A Decision-Theoretic Approach for Managing Misalignmentcited by 0
  18. 2026Honeypot Protocolcited by 0
  19. 2026Bootstrapped Monitoring: Leveraging Transparent Reasoning to Oversee Stronger AI Agentscited by 0
  20. 2026DrugBench: Evaluating AI Control Protocols for Medication Harm Mitigationcited by 0
  21. 2026On Understanding, Identifying, and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Modelscited by 0
  22. 2026Bounded Sovereignty and the Control Tax: Pricing AI Oversight When the Deployer Does Not Own the Modelcited by 0
  23. 2026More Rejective, Not More Discriminative: The Unit of Verification in Pre-Execution LLM Oversightcited by 0
  24. 2026Counter-Swarm Doctrine: Containing Coordinated Agent Intrusionscited by 0
  25. 2026SchemeArena: Factorized Stress Testing of Scheming in LLM Agentscited by 0
  26. 2026Who Audits Whom, on What Substrate, with What Evidence? An Independence-Graded Audit Protocol for Agentic AIcited by 0
  27. 2026Red-Teaming Auto Mode: Improving Blocking Classifiers Against Malign Coding Agentscited by 0
  28. 2026When Should a Human Take Back Control? Optimal Delegation under Turbulent AI Riskcited by 0