mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing AI Agent Attacks With Synthetic Data

arXiv 2511.02823 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI deployments become more complex and high-stakes, it becomes increasingly important to be able to estimate their risk. AI control is one framework for doing so. However, good control evaluations require eliciting strong attack policies. This can be challenging in complex agentic environments where compute constraints leave us data-poor. In this work, we show how to optimize attack policies in SHADE-Arena, a dataset of diverse realistic control environments. We do this by decomposing attack capability into five constituent skills -- suspicion modeling, attack selection, plan synthesis, execution and subtlety -- and optimizing each component individually. To get around the constraint of limited data, we develop a probabilistic model of attack dynamics, optimize our attack hyperparameters using this simulation, and then show that the results transfer to SHADE-Arena. This results in a substantial improvement in attack strength, reducing safety score from a baseline of 0.87 to 0.41 using our scaffold.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.

Builds on

8 of 16 references.

References · 8

  1. 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 252
  2. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 207
  3. 2024Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilitiescited by 121
  4. 2023Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?cited by 90
  5. 2025SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agentscited by 58
  6. 2025Ctrl-Z: Controlling AI Agents via Resamplingcited by 40
  7. 2025Evaluating Frontier Models for Stealth and Situational Awarenesscited by 30
  8. 2024Games for AI Control: Models of Safety Evaluations of AI Deployment Protocolscited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Evaluating Control Protocols for Untrusted AI Agents
  2. 2025Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition
  3. 2026To Defend Against Cyber Attacks, We Must Teach AI Agents to Hack
  4. 2026RIFT-Bench: Dynamic Red-teaming For Agentic AI Systems
  5. 2026The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey
  6. 2026Measuring AI Agents' Progress on Multi-Step Cyber Attack Scenarios
  7. 2026A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework
  8. 2026Securing the AI Agent: A Unified Framework for Multi-Layer Agent Red Teaming