Bootstrapped Monitoring: Leveraging Transparent Reasoning to Oversee Stronger AI Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trusted monitoring is a cornerstone of AI control. However, as frontier models grow more capable, the increasing capabilities gap between trusted and untrusted models may render trusted models unreliable monitors. We introduce bootstrapped monitoring, a protocol that addresses this by inserting a stronger, intermediate untrusted model with transparent chain-of-thought reasoning into the oversight chain. The untrusted monitor (Um) evaluates the agent's actions, while a weaker trusted model (T) oversees Um's reasoning to detect collusion. We evaluate bootstrapped monitoring on multi-turn software engineering tasks (BashArena) across multiple agents and monitors. Bootstrapped monitoring substantially improves catch rates over trusted-only monitoring, even when the untrusted monitor actively colludes with the agent, provided we have access to its raw chain-of-thought. Our results suggest that bootstrapped monitoring can extend the useful lifetime of trusted models in control as AI capabilities advance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 316
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 222
- 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 207
- 2024On scalable oversight with weak LLMs judging strong LLMscited by 94
- 2025CoT Red-Handed: Stress Testing Chain-of-Thought Monitoringcited by 49
- 2025Ctrl-Z: Controlling AI Agents via Resamplingcited by 40
- 2025A sketch of an AI control safety casecited by 36
5 more
- 2026Reasoning Models Struggle to Control their Chains of Thoughtcited by 22
- 2025Scaling Laws For Scalable Oversightcited by 18
- 2025BashArena: A Control Setting for Highly Privileged AI Agentscited by 15
- 2024Subversion Strategy Eval: Can language models statelessly strategize to subvert control protocols?cited by 14
- 2026Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Modelscited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Monitoring Monitorability
- 2025When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors
- 2026Training on Documents About Monitoring Leads to CoT Obfuscation
- 2026CoT-Guard: Small Models for Strong Monitoring
- 2026ClawSentry: A Progressive Multi-Tier Security Monitor for Safeguarding Autonomous LLM Agents
- 2026Noticing the Watcher: LLM Agents Can Infer CoT Monitoring from Blocking Feedback
- 2026LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments
- 2026ResearchArena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in Automated AI R&D