mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Survey of Machine Learning Models and Datasets for the Multi-label Classification of Textual Hate Speech in English

arXiv 2504.08609 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The dissemination of online hate speech can have serious negative consequences for individuals, online communities, and entire societies. This and the large volume of hateful online content prompted both practitioners', i.e., in content moderation or law enforcement, and researchers' interest in machine learning models to automatically classify instances of hate speech. Whereas most scientific works address hate speech classification as a binary task, practice often requires a differentiation into sub-types, e.g., according to target, severity, or legality, which may overlap for individual content. Hence, researchers created datasets and machine learning models that approach hate speech classification in textual data as a multi-label problem. This work presents the first systematic and comprehensive survey of scientific literature on this emerging research landscape in English (N=46). We contribute with a concise overview of 28 datasets suited for training multi-label classification models that reveals significant heterogeneity regarding label-set, size, meta-concept, annotation process, and inter-annotator agreement. Our analysis of 24 publications proposing suitable classification models further establishes inconsistency in evaluation and a preference for architectures based on Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). We identify imbalanced training data, reliance on crowdsourcing platforms, small and sparse datasets, and missing methodological alignment as critical open issues and formulate ten recommendations for research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 128 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2025.

Builds on

39 of 128 references.

References · 39

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  6. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  7. 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
  8. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 422
  9. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 407
  10. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 271
  11. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 270
  12. 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 221
27 more
  1. 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 216
  2. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 210
  3. 2020HateBERT: Retraining BERT for Abusive Language Detection in Englishcited by 207
  4. 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
  5. 2019CONAN -- COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speechcited by 110
  6. 2021Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speechcited by 82
  7. 2020ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Datasetcited by 66
  8. 2021Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutionscited by 66
  9. 2018Challenges for Toxic Comment Classification: An In-Depth Error Analysiscited by 56
  10. 2020Deep Learning Models for Multilingual Hate Speech Detectioncited by 49
  11. 2020Developing a Multilingual Annotated Corpus of Misogyny and Aggressioncited by 33
  12. 2021A systematic review of Hate Speech automatic detection using Natural Language Processingcited by 27
  13. 2024Recent Advances in Hate Speech Moderation: Multimodality and the Role of Large Modelscited by 26
  14. 2021A Framework of Severity for Harmful Content Onlinecited by 23
  15. 2022Data Bootstrapping Approaches to Improve Low Resource Abusive Language Detection for Indic Languagescited by 23
  16. 2019Multi-label Categorization of Accounts of Sexism using a Neural Frameworkcited by 19
  17. 2020Six Attributes of Unhealthy Conversationcited by 19
  18. 2023A Diachronic Analysis of Paradigm Shifts in NLP Research: When, How, and Why?cited by 14
  19. 2020A Legal Approach to Hate Speech: Operationalizing the EU's Legal Framework against the Expression of Hatred as an NLP Taskcited by 11
  20. 2024"Community Guidelines Make this the Best Party on the Internet": An In-Depth Study of Online Platforms' Content Moderation Policiescited by 11
  21. 2021pysentimiento: A Python Toolkit for Opinion Mining and Social NLP taskscited by 9
  22. 2023SuperTweetEval: A Challenging, Unified and Heterogeneous Benchmark for Social Media NLP Researchcited by 9
  23. 2021Towards offensive language detection and reduction in four Software Engineering communitiescited by 7
  24. 2021Exploring multi-task multi-lingual learning of transformer models for hate speech and offensive speech identification in social mediacited by 5
  25. 2022This Sample seems to be good enough! Assessing Coverage and Temporal Reliability of Twitter's Academic APIcited by 5
  26. 2021Hate, Obscenity, and Insults: Measuring the Exposure of Children to Inappropriate Comments in YouTubecited by 4
  27. 2025Do Attention Heads Compete or Cooperate during Counting?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.