mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting

arXiv 2403.11491 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time adaptation (TTA) seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and test data by adapting a given model w.r.t. any test sample. Although recent TTA has shown promising performance, we still face two key challenges: 1) prior methods perform backpropagation for each test sample, resulting in unbearable optimization costs to many applications; 2) while existing TTA can significantly improve the test performance on out-of-distribution data, they often suffer from severe performance degradation on in-distribution data after TTA (known as forgetting). To this end, we have proposed an Efficient Anti-Forgetting Test-Time Adaptation (EATA) method which develops an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples for test-time entropy minimization. To alleviate forgetting, EATA introduces a Fisher regularizer estimated from test samples to constrain important model parameters from drastic changes. However, in EATA, the adopted entropy loss consistently assigns higher confidence to predictions even for samples that are underlying uncertain, leading to overconfident predictions. To tackle this, we further propose EATA with Calibration (EATA-C) to separately exploit the reducible model uncertainty and the inherent data uncertainty for calibrated TTA. Specifically, we measure the model uncertainty by the divergence between predictions from the full network and its sub-networks, on which we propose a divergence loss to encourage consistent predictions instead of overconfident ones. To further recalibrate prediction confidence, we utilize the disagreement among predicted labels as an indicator of the data uncertainty, and then devise a min-max entropy regularizer to selectively increase and decrease prediction confidence for different samples. Experiments on image classification and semantic segmentation verify the effectiveness of our methods.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 71 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

71 of 96 references.

References · 71

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  5. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  6. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  7. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  8. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  9. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  11. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  12. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
38 more
  1. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  2. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  3. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  4. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  5. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  6. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
  7. 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
  8. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  9. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  10. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  11. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  12. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  13. 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 682
  14. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  15. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  16. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  17. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  18. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  19. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 361
  20. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  21. 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
  22. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  23. 2022Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labelscited by 218
  24. 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
  25. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
  26. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  27. 2018Multi-Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 195
  28. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
  29. 2020Inf-Net: Automatic COVID-19 Lung Infection Segmentation from CT Imagescited by 184
  30. 2020Dense Regression Network for Video Groundingcited by 176
  31. 2021Source-free Domain Adaptation via Avatar Prototype Generation and Adaptationcited by 111
  32. 2017Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 99
  33. 2021Self-Supervised Aggregation of Diverse Experts for Test-Agnostic Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 95
  34. 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 89
  35. 2020RSPNet: Relative Speed Perception for Unsupervised Video Representation Learningcited by 83
  36. 2019Striking the Right Balance with Uncertaintycited by 79
  37. 2021Can Subnetwork Structure be the Key to Out-of-Distribution Generalization?cited by 75
  38. 2020On Feature Normalization and Data Augmentationcited by 71

50 most cited of 71 All 71 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 8; 2026: 9.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
  2. 2024Reshaping the Online Data Buffering and Organizing Mechanism for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 9
  3. 2025Self-Bootstrapping for Versatile Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
  4. 2025Active Test-time Vision-Language Navigationcited by 7
  5. 2024Learning to Generate Gradients for Test-Time Adaptation via Test-Time Training Layerscited by 3
  6. 2025Adapt in the Wild: Test-Time Entropy Minimization with Sharpness and Feature Regularizationcited by 3
  7. 2026Dual-level Adaptation for Multi-Object Tracking: Building Test-Time Calibration from Experience and Intuitioncited by 2
  8. 2026Dance Across Shifts: Forward-Facilitation Continual Test-Time Adaptation through Dynamic Style Bridgingcited by 2
  9. 2026Turning Adaptation into Assets: Cross-Domain Bridging for Online Vision-Language Navigationcited by 2
  10. 2025EmbodiTTA: Resource-Efficient Test-Time Adaptation for Embodied Visual Systemscited by 1
  11. 2025Feature-Based Instance Neighbor Discovery: Advanced Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Worldcited by 1
  12. 2025Efficient Test-Time Adaptation through Latent Subspace Coefficients Searchcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2025Neural Collapse in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 1
  2. 2025Cross-Sample Augmented Test-Time Adaptation for Personalized Intraoperative Hypotension Predictioncited by 1
  3. 2026A3-TTA: Adaptive Anchor Alignment Test-Time Adaptation for Image Segmentationcited by 1
  4. 2026ProtoDCS: Towards Robust and Efficient Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
  5. 2026Subspace Optimization for Backpropagation-Free Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 1
  6. 2026From Exposure to Internalization: Dual-Stream Calibration for In-context Clinical Reasoningcited by 0
  7. 2026Pretrain-then-Adapt: Uncertainty-Aware Test-Time Adaptation for Text-based Person Searchcited by 0
  8. 2026Segment Anything with Robust Uncertainty-Accuracy Correlationcited by 0