Deconstructing Jazz Piano Style Using Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artistic style has been studied for centuries, and recent advances in machine learning create new possibilities for understanding it computationally. However, ensuring that machine-learning models produce insights aligned with the interests of practitioners and critics remains a significant challenge. Here, we focus on musical style, which benefits from a rich theoretical and mathematical analysis tradition. We train a variety of supervised-learning models to identify 20 iconic jazz musicians across a carefully curated dataset of 84 hours of recordings, and interpret their decision-making processes. Our models include a novel multi-input architecture that enables four musical domains (melody, harmony, rhythm, and dynamics) to be analysed separately. These models enable us to address fundamental questions in music theory and also advance the state-of-the-art in music performer identification (94% accuracy across 20 classes). We release open-source implementations of our models and an accompanying web application for exploring musical styles.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 189 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.
Builds on
22 of 189 references.
References · 22
- 2024BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languagescited by 173
- 2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Viewscited by 148
- 2023Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 126
- 2024Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyondcited by 103
- 2024A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistantscited by 76
- 2025The Widespread Adoption of Large Language Model-Assisted Writing Across Societycited by 51
- 2024LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers' Usage and Perceptionscited by 47
- 2024Understanding User Experience in Large Language Model Interactionscited by 44
- 2024Detection and Measurement of Syntactic Templates in Generated Textcited by 44
- 2024The Value, Benefits, and Concerns of Generative AI-Powered Assistance in Writingcited by 37
- 2024Are We in the AI-Generated Text World Already? Quantifying and Monitoring AIGT on Social Mediacited by 35
- 2022What a Creole Wants, What a Creole Needscited by 27
10 more
- 2023Scientists' Perspectives on the Potential for Generative AI in their Fieldscited by 22
- 2024What Do Dialect Speakers Want? A Survey of Attitudes Towards Language Technology for German Dialectscited by 21
- 2019Exciting, Useful, Worrying, Futuristic: Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in 8 Countriescited by 20
- 2023Friend or Foe? Exploring the Implications of Large Language Models on the Science Systemcited by 16
- 2024Tracing the Roots of Facts in Multilingual Language Models: Independent, Shared, and Transferred Knowledgecited by 14
- 2024From Pen to Prompt: How Creative Writers Integrate AI into their Writing Practicecited by 14
- 2024Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Artcited by 11
- 2023Diversity and Language Technology: How Techno-Linguistic Bias Can Cause Epistemic Injusticecited by 4
- 2025Mind the Gap! Choice Independence in Using Multilingual LLMs for Persuasive Co-Writing Tasks in Different Languagescited by 3
- 2024Precarity and Solidarity: Preliminary results on a study of queer and disabled fiction writers' experiences with generative AIcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.