mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding User Experience in Large Language Model Interactions

arXiv 2401.08329 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2024cs.HCcited by 44

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the rapidly evolving landscape of large language models (LLMs), most research has primarily viewed them as independent individuals, focusing on assessing their capabilities through standardized benchmarks and enhancing their general intelligence. This perspective, however, tends to overlook the vital role of LLMs as user-centric services in human-AI collaboration. This gap in research becomes increasingly critical as LLMs become more integrated into people's everyday and professional interactions. This study addresses the important need to understand user satisfaction with LLMs by exploring four key aspects: comprehending user intents, scrutinizing user experiences, addressing major user concerns about current LLM services, and charting future research paths to bolster human-AI collaborations. Our study develops a taxonomy of 7 user intents in LLM interactions, grounded in analysis of real-world user interaction logs and human verification. Subsequently, we conduct a user survey to gauge their satisfaction with LLM services, encompassing usage frequency, experiences across intents, and predominant concerns. This survey, compiling 411 anonymous responses, uncovers 11 first-hand insights into the current state of user engagement with LLMs. Based on this empirical analysis, we pinpoint 6 future research directions prioritizing the user perspective in LLM developments. This user-centered approach is essential for crafting LLMs that are not just technologically advanced but also resonate with the intricate realities of human interactions and real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 44 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 20; 2026: 15.

44 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Surveycited by 162
  2. 2025CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaboratorscited by 124
  3. 2024MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Trainingcited by 76
  4. 2024Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instructioncited by 42
  5. 2024Stereotype or Personalization? User Identity Biases Chatbot Recommendationscited by 34
  6. 2026AgentNoiseBench: Benchmarking Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents Under Noisy Conditioncited by 23
  7. 2025JITServe: SLO-aware LLM Serving with Imprecise Request Informationcited by 17
  8. 2024Rel-A.I.: An Interaction-Centered Approach To Measuring Human-LM Reliancecited by 16
  9. 2025Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missingcited by 14
  10. 2025Conversational User-AI Intervention: A Study on Prompt Rewriting for Improved LLM Response Generationcited by 10
  11. 2025Catch Me If You Can? Not Yet: LLMs Still Struggle to Imitate the Implicit Writing Styles of Everyday Authorscited by 10
  12. 2025Generalizability of Large Language Model-Based Agents: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 10
32 more
  1. 2025TokenFlow: Responsive LLM Text Streaming Serving under Request Burst via Preemptive Schedulingcited by 10
  2. 2024GUI Action Narrator: Where and When Did That Action Take Place?cited by 9
  3. 2026MTRAG-UN: A Benchmark for Open Challenges in Multi-Turn RAG Conversationscited by 9
  4. 2026PrefIx: Understand and Adapt to User Preference in Human-Agent Interactioncited by 7
  5. 2025LLM Content Moderation and User Satisfaction: Evidence from Response Refusals in Chatbot Arenacited by 6
  6. 2026Learning to Act under Noise: Enhancing Agent Robustness via Noisy Environmentscited by 6
  7. 2024The Interaction Layer: An Exploration for Co-Designing User-LLM Interactions in Parental Wellbeing Support Systemscited by 3
  8. 2025Improving Neutral Point-of-View Generation with Data- and Parameter-Efficient RLcited by 3
  9. 2025Disaggregated Prefill and Decoding Inference System for Large Language Model Serving on Multi-Vendor GPUscited by 3
  10. 2026Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirerscited by 3
  11. 2025Review of Hallucination Understanding in Large Language and Vision Modelscited by 2
  12. 2026Understanding Usage and Engagement in AI-Powered Scientific Research Tools: The Asta Interaction Datasetcited by 2
  13. 2026Reflections and New Directions for Human-Centered Large Language Modelscited by 2
  14. 2024Large Language Models as Conversational Movie Recommenders: A User Studycited by 1
  15. 2025Foundations of GenIRcited by 1
  16. 2025Advertising in AI systems: Society must be vigilantcited by 1
  17. 2025Sequential Bayesian Evaluation of Large Language Model Behaviorcited by 1
  18. 2026Learning Through Dialogue: Engagement and Efficacy Matter More Than Explanationscited by 1
  19. 2026Learning to Learn from Language Feedback with Social Meta-Learningcited by 1
  20. 2026Measuring Distribution Shift in User Prompts and Its Effects on LLM Performancecited by 1
  21. 2026Shared Doubt: Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Confidence Estimation for Language Modelscited by 1
  22. 2024EventChat: Implementation and user-centric evaluation of a large language model-driven conversational recommender system for exploring leisure events in an SME contextcited by 0
  23. 2025How desirable is alignment between LLMs and linguistically diverse human users?cited by 0
  24. 2025Deconstructing Jazz Piano Style Using Machine Learningcited by 0
  25. 2025WaLLM -- Understanding Use and Engagement with a General-Purpose LLM on WhatsAppcited by 0
  26. 2025OSS-UAgent: An Agent-based Usability Evaluation Framework for Open Source Softwarecited by 0
  27. 2025Integrating Transparent Models, LLMs, and Practitioner-in-the-Loop: A Case of Nonprofit Program Evaluationcited by 0
  28. 2025Large Language Models' Complicit Responses to Illicit Instructions across Socio-Legal Contextscited by 0
  29. 2026Prism: Towards Lowering User Cognitive Load in LLMs via Complex Intent Understandingcited by 0
  30. 2026Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 0
  31. 2026COACH meets QUORUM: A Framework and Pipeline for Aligning User, Expert and Developer Perspectives in LLM-generated Health Counsellingcited by 0
  32. 2026Expectation Alignment of Language Models for Real-World User Expectationscited by 0