mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ADAPT: Actively Discovering and Adapting to Preferences for any Task

arXiv 2504.04040 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2025cs.AI cs.ROcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Assistive agents should be able to perform under-specified long-horizon tasks while respecting user preferences. We introduce Actively Discovering and Adapting to Preferences for any Task (ADAPT) -- a benchmark designed to evaluate agents' ability to adhere to user preferences across various household tasks through active questioning. Next, we propose Reflection-DPO, a novel training approach for adapting large language models (LLMs) to the task of active questioning. Reflection-DPO finetunes a 'student' LLM to follow the actions of a privileged 'teacher' LLM, and optionally ask a question to gather necessary information to better predict the teacher action. We find that prior approaches that use state-of-the-art LLMs fail to sufficiently follow user preferences in ADAPT due to insufficient questioning and poor adherence to elicited preferences. In contrast, Reflection-DPO achieves a higher rate of satisfying user preferences, outperforming a zero-shot chain-of-thought baseline by 6.1% on unseen users.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 43 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2025.

Builds on

43 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024LLM-Personalize: Aligning LLM Planners with Human Preferences via Reinforced Self-Training for Housekeeping Robots22 Apr
  2. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Planners4 Jul
  3. 2022Training Language Models with Language Feedback29 Apr

Other references · 40

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  4. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  5. 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
  6. 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 733
  7. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
  8. 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 411
  9. 2023SayPlan: Grounding Large Language Models using 3D Scene Graphs for Scalable Robot Task Planningcited by 289
  10. 2019Vision-and-Dialog Navigationcited by 246
  11. 2023TidyBot: Personalized Robot Assistance with Large Language Modelscited by 219
  12. 2021TEACh: Task-driven Embodied Agents that Chatcited by 194
28 more
  1. 2023Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuningcited by 186
  2. 2023HomeRobot: Open-Vocabulary Mobile Manipulationcited by 104
  3. 2022Robot Learning on the Job: Human-in-the-Loop Autonomy and Learning During Deploymentcited by 101
  4. 2024STaR-GATE: Teaching Language Models to Ask Clarifying Questionscited by 99
  5. 2024PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Taskscited by 78
  6. 2020Learning Reward Functions from Diverse Sources of Human Feedback: Optimally Integrating Demonstrations and Preferencescited by 71
  7. 2022Correcting Robot Plans with Natural Language Feedbackcited by 68
  8. 2023Grounded Decoding: Guiding Text Generation with Grounded Models for Embodied Agentscited by 66
  9. 2021MindCraft: Theory of Mind Modeling for Situated Dialogue in Collaborative Taskscited by 62
  10. 2023Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversationscited by 38
  11. 2022CHAI: A CHatbot AI for Task-Oriented Dialogue with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  12. 2024Bayesian Preference Elicitation with Language Modelscited by 32
  13. 2023Decision-Oriented Dialogue for Human-AI Collaborationcited by 29
  14. 2023Active Preference Inference using Language Models and Probabilistic Reasoningcited by 29
  15. 2023CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agentscited by 28
  16. 2021My House, My Rules: Learning Tidying Preferences with Graph Neural Networkscited by 27
  17. 2020The RobotSlang Benchmark: Dialog-guided Robot Localization and Navigationcited by 26
  18. 2024Learning to Learn Faster from Human Feedback with Language Model Predictive Controlcited by 25
  19. 2023Incremental Learning of Humanoid Robot Behavior from Natural Interaction and Large Language Modelscited by 19
  20. 2022Ask4Help: Learning to Leverage an Expert for Embodied Taskscited by 18
  21. 2024Trajectory Improvement and Reward Learning from Comparative Language Feedbackcited by 17
  22. 2022Transformers are Adaptable Task Plannerscited by 15
  23. 2022Dialog Acts for Task-Driven Embodied Agentscited by 13
  24. 2024APRICOT: Active Preference Learning and Constraint-Aware Task Planning with LLMscited by 11
  25. 2025MILE: Model-based Intervention Learningcited by 7
  26. 2019Continuous Control for High-Dimensional State Spaces: An Interactive Learning Approachcited by 5
  27. 2022Good Time to Ask: A Learning Framework for Asking for Help in Embodied Visual Navigationcited by 3
  28. 2025From Action Labels to Sets: Rethinking Action Supervision for Imitation Learning from Corrective Feedbackcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Transferable Latent User Preferences for Human-Aligned Decision Making
  2. 2023Eliciting Human Preferences with Language Models
  3. 2026Rational Clarification by Assistive Agents via Value-of-Information Reasoning
  4. 2024Aligning LLM Agents by Learning Latent Preference from User Edits
  5. 2026Ask Now, Use Later: Benchmarking the Proactivity Gap in Long-Lived LLM Agents
  6. 2025ProPerSim: Developing Proactive and Personalized AI Assistants through User-Assistant Simulation
  7. 2025Enhancing Personalized Multi-Turn Dialogue with Curiosity Reward
  8. 2026User Preference Modeling for Conversational LLM Agents: Weak Rewards from Retrieval-Augmented Interaction