mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

World Model Agents with Change-Based Intrinsic Motivation

arXiv 2503.21047 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2025cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: World models → Latent dynamics models and model-based RL

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse reward environments pose a significant challenge for reinforcement learning due to the scarcity of feedback. Intrinsic motivation and transfer learning have emerged as promising strategies to address this issue. Change Based Exploration Transfer (CBET), a technique that combines these two approaches for model-free algorithms, has shown potential in addressing sparse feedback but its effectiveness with modern algorithms remains understudied. This paper provides an adaptation of CBET for world model algorithms like DreamerV3 and compares the performance of DreamerV3 and IMPALA agents, both with and without CBET, in the sparse reward environments of Crafter and Minigrid. Our tabula rasa results highlight the possibility of CBET improving DreamerV3's returns in Crafter but the algorithm attains a suboptimal policy in Minigrid with CBET further reducing returns. In the same vein, our transfer learning experiments show that pre-training DreamerV3 with intrinsic rewards does not immediately lead to a policy that maximizes extrinsic rewards in Minigrid. Overall, our results suggest that CBET provides a positive impact on DreamerV3 in more complex environments like Crafter but may be detrimental in environments like Minigrid. In the latter case, the behaviours promoted by CBET in DreamerV3 may not align with the task objectives of the environment, leading to reduced returns and suboptimal policies.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent dynamics models and model-based RL, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.

Builds on

13 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models10 Jan
  2. 2021Fractional Transfer Learning for Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning14 Aug

Other references · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  3. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  4. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
  5. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  6. 2023Minigrid & Miniworld: Modular & Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environments for Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 320
  7. 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 307
  8. 2020Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 259
  9. 2021Benchmarking the Spectrum of Agent Capabilitiescited by 193
  10. 2020RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated Environmentscited by 135
  11. 2021Interesting Object, Curious Agent: Learning Task-Agnostic Explorationcited by 38

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Towards Improving Exploration in Self-Imitation Learning using Intrinsic Motivation
  2. 2023Intrinsic Motivation in Model-based Reinforcement Learning: A Brief Review
  3. 2025Minding Motivation: The Effect of Intrinsic Motivation on Agent Behaviors
  4. 2026Reward-free Pretraining for Reinforcement Learning via Occupancy Coverage Maximization
  5. 2022The Effectiveness of World Models for Continual Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2022On the Feasibility of Cross-Task Transfer with Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2023Enhanced Generalization through Prioritization and Diversity in Self-Imitation Reinforcement Learning over Procedural Environments with Sparse Rewards
  8. 2023Foundations for Transfer in Reinforcement Learning: A Taxonomy of Knowledge Modalities