The Trust Calibration Maturity Model for Characterizing and Communicating Trustworthiness of AI Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent proliferation of powerful AI systems has created a strong need for capabilities that help users to calibrate trust in those systems. As AI systems grow in scale, information required to evaluate their trustworthiness becomes less accessible, presenting a growing risk of using these systems inappropriately. We propose the Trust Calibration Maturity Model (TCMM) to characterize and communicate information about AI system trustworthiness. The TCMM incorporates five dimensions of analytic maturity: Performance Characterization, Bias & Robustness Quantification, Transparency, Safety & Security, and Usability. The TCMM can be presented along with system performance information to (1) help a user to appropriately calibrate trust, (2) establish requirements and track progress, and (3) identify research needs. Here, we discuss the TCMM and demonstrate it on two target tasks: using ChatGPT for high consequence nuclear science determinations, and using PhaseNet (an ensemble of seismic models) for categorizing sources of seismic events.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2025.
Builds on
19 of 70 references.
References · 19
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
- 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 222
7 more
- 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 211
- 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 167
- 2023AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmapcited by 123
- 2019How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trustcited by 45
- 2024AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Securitycited by 17
- 2023NuclearQA: A Human-Made Benchmark for Language Models for the Nuclear Domaincited by 7
- 2025Evaluation of Seismic Artificial Intelligence with Uncertaintycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025A Maslow-Inspired Hierarchy of Engagement with AI Modelcited by 0
- 2025A Maslow-Inspired Hierarchy of Engagement with AI Model7 Sep 2025