NuclearQA: A Human-Made Benchmark for Language Models for the Nuclear Domain
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As LLMs have become increasingly popular, they have been used in almost every field. But as the application for LLMs expands from generic fields to narrow, focused science domains, there exists an ever-increasing gap in ways to evaluate their efficacy in those fields. For the benchmarks that do exist, a lot of them focus on questions that don't require proper understanding of the subject in question. In this paper, we present NuclearQA, a human-made benchmark of 100 questions to evaluate language models in the nuclear domain, consisting of a varying collection of questions that have been specifically designed by experts to test the abilities of language models. We detail our approach and show how the mix of several types of questions makes our benchmark uniquely capable of evaluating models in the nuclear domain. We also present our own evaluation metric for assessing LLM's performances due to the limitations of existing ones. Our experiments on state-of-the-art models suggest that even the best LLMs perform less than satisfactorily on our benchmark, demonstrating the scientific knowledge gap of existing LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.
Builds on
29 of 41 references.
References · 29
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
17 more
- 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 744
- 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 476
- 2020SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformerscited by 430
- 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 368
- 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 341
- 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 331
- 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 256
- 2017SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Enginecited by 225
- 2023TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering datasetcited by 192
- 2018emrQA: A Large Corpus for Question Answering on Electronic Medical Recordscited by 135
- 2022SciRepEval: A Multi-Format Benchmark for Scientific Document Representationscited by 129
- 2021Think you have Solved Direct-Answer Question Answering? Try ARC-DA, the Direct-Answer AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 80
- 2022BigBIO: A Framework for Data-Centric Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 36
- 2020BIOMRC: A Dataset for Biomedical Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 35
- 2020Towards an Atlas of Cultural Commonsense for Machine Reasoningcited by 29
- 2020NukeBERT: A Pre-trained language model for Low Resource Nuclear Domaincited by 7
- 2021OneStop QAMaker: Extract Question-Answer Pairs from Text in a One-Stop Approachcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025MatSciBench: Benchmarking the Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models in Materials Sciencecited by 15
- 2024A Survey of Pre-trained Language Models for Processing Scientific Textcited by 7
- 2023Post Turing: Mapping the landscape of LLM Evaluationcited by 4
- 2024WeQA: A Benchmark for Retrieval Augmented Generation in Wind Energy Domaincited by 4
- 2025The Trust Calibration Maturity Model for Characterizing and Communicating Trustworthiness of AI Systemscited by 1
- 2026NuclearQAv2: A Structured Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-Science Competence in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026LLM-Guided Planning for Multi-hop Reasoning over Multimodal Nuclear Regulatory Documentscited by 0
- 2026LLM-Guided Planning for Multi-hop Reasoning over Multimodal Nuclear Regulatory Documents28 Jun 2026
- 2026NuclearQAv2: A Structured Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-Science Competence in Large Language Models25 Jun 2026
- 2025MatSciBench: Benchmarking the Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models in Materials Science14 Oct 2025
- 2025The Trust Calibration Maturity Model for Characterizing and Communicating Trustworthiness of AI Systems28 Jan 2025
- 2024WeQA: A Benchmark for Retrieval Augmented Generation in Wind Energy Domain21 Aug 2024
- 2024A Survey of Pre-trained Language Models for Processing Scientific Text31 Jan 2024
- 2023Post Turing: Mapping the landscape of LLM Evaluation3 Nov 2023