Evaluation of Seismic Artificial Intelligence with Uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence has transformed the seismic community with deep learning models (DLMs) that are trained to complete specific tasks within workflows. However, there is still lack of robust evaluation frameworks for evaluating and comparing DLMs. We address this gap by designing an evaluation framework that jointly incorporates two crucial aspects: performance uncertainty and learning efficiency. To target these aspects, we meticulously construct the training, validation, and test splits using a clustering method tailored to seismic data and enact an expansive training design to segregate performance uncertainty arising from stochastic training processes and random data sampling. The framework's ability to guard against misleading declarations of model superiority is demonstrated through evaluation of PhaseNet [1], a popular seismic phase picking DLM, under 3 training approaches. Our framework helps practitioners choose the best model for their problem and set performance expectations by explicitly analyzing model performance with uncertainty at varying budgets of training data.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2025.
Builds on
21 of 54 references.
References · 21
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 349
- 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 283
- 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 195
9 more
- 2021The Benchmark Lotterycited by 133
- 2017Reporting Score Distributions Makes a Difference: Performance Study of LSTM-networks for Sequence Taggingcited by 71
- 2023SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extractioncited by 8
- 2024SeisLM: a Foundation Model for Seismic Waveformscited by 8
- 2019Deep learning for seismic phase detection and picking in the aftershock zone of 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquakecited by 7
- 2019Measuring the Data Efficiency of Deep Learning Methodscited by 5
- 2024SpanSeq: Similarity-based sequence data splitting method for improved development and assessment of deep learning projectscited by 5
- 2024A foundation model enpowered by a multi-modal prompt engine for universal seismic geobody interpretation across surveyscited by 2
- 2022Seismic-phase detection using multiple deep learning models for global and local representations of waveformscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.