mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

OpeNLGauge: An Explainable Metric for NLG Evaluation with Open-Weights LLMs

arXiv 2503.11858 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential as evaluators of NLG systems, allowing for high-quality, reference-free, and multi-aspect assessments. However, existing LLM-based metrics suffer from two major drawbacks: reliance on proprietary models to generate training data or perform evaluations, and a lack of fine-grained, explanatory feedback. In this paper, we introduce OpeNLGauge, a fully open-source, reference-free NLG evaluation metric that provides accurate explanations based on error spans. OpeNLGauge is available as a two-stage ensemble of larger open-weight LLMs, or as a small fine-tuned evaluation model, with confirmed generalizability to unseen tasks, domains and aspects. Our extensive meta-evaluation shows that OpeNLGauge achieves competitive correlation with human judgments, outperforming state-of-the-art models on certain tasks while maintaining full reproducibility and providing explanations more than twice as accurate.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 100 of its 142 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

100 of 142 references.

References · 100

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  7. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  8. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  9. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  10. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  11. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  12. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
38 more
  1. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  2. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  3. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  4. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  5. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  6. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  7. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  8. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
  9. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  10. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  11. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
  12. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  13. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
  14. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  15. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
  16. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 652
  17. 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 597
  18. 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
  19. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
  20. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 575
  21. 2017Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 552
  22. 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 535
  23. 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
  24. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  25. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 418
  26. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
  27. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  28. 2024DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligencecited by 331
  29. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 326
  30. 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 294
  31. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 270
  32. 2020ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Datasetcited by 268
  33. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  34. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 253
  35. 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 235
  36. 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 234
  37. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 233
  38. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229

50 most cited of 100 All 100 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.