ZeroSumEval: An Extensible Framework For Scaling LLM Evaluation with Inter-Model Competition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce ZeroSumEval, a dynamic, competition-based, and evolving evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) that leverages competitive games. ZeroSumEval encompasses a diverse suite of games, including security challenges (Capture the Flag), classic board games (chess), and knowledge tests (MathQuiz). These games are designed to evaluate a range of capabilities such as strategic reasoning, planning, knowledge application, safety, and adaptability. Building upon recent studies that highlight the effectiveness of game-based evaluations for LLMs, ZeroSumEval enhances these approaches by providing a standardized and extensible framework for easily implementing games and leverages DSPy to provide a better abstraction for LLM player strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
- 2023FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentationcited by 308
- 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 223
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
- 2023Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samplescited by 192
- 2024When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboardscited by 134
- 2023SmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agentscited by 123
- 2023From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to the Probabilistic Language of Thoughtcited by 118
- 2024GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluationscited by 118
8 more
- 2024GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agentscited by 89
- 2024A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendationscited by 84
- 2023NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classescited by 78
- 2023Elo Uncovered: Robustness and Best Practices in Language Model Evaluationcited by 58
- 2024CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agentscited by 38
- 2023DSPy Assertions: Computational Constraints for Self-Refining Language Model Pipelinescited by 27
- 2024Evaluating Large Language Models with Grid-Based Game Competitions: An Extensible LLM Benchmark and Leaderboardcited by 22
- 2025Are Large Vision Language Models Good Game Players?cited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Measuring General Intelligence with Generated Gamescited by 21
- 2025Tournament of Prompts: Evolving LLM Instructions Through Structured Debates and Elo Ratingscited by 5
- 2026Interactive Critique-Revision Training for Reliable Structured LLM Generationcited by 2
- 2025SKATE, a Scalable Tournament Eval: Weaker LLMs differentiate between stronger ones using verifiable challengescited by 1
- 2026Position: AI Is Not Ready for Strategic Conflictscited by 0
- 2026Position: AI Is Not Ready for Strategic Conflicts31 Jul 2026
- 2026Interactive Critique-Revision Training for Reliable Structured LLM Generation8 May 2026
- 2025SKATE, a Scalable Tournament Eval: Weaker LLMs differentiate between stronger ones using verifiable challenges8 Aug 2025
- 2025Tournament of Prompts: Evolving LLM Instructions Through Structured Debates and Elo Ratings30 May 2025
- 2025Measuring General Intelligence with Generated Games12 May 2025