mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic-KGQA: A Scalable Framework for Generating Adaptive Question Answering Datasets

arXiv 2503.05049 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.IR cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As question answering (QA) systems advance alongside the rapid evolution of foundation models, the need for robust, adaptable, and large-scale evaluation benchmarks becomes increasingly critical. Traditional QA benchmarks are often static and publicly available, making them susceptible to data contamination and memorization by large language models (LLMs). Consequently, static benchmarks may overestimate model generalization and hinder a reliable assessment of real-world performance. In this work, we introduce Dynamic-KGQA, a scalable framework for generating adaptive QA datasets from knowledge graphs (KGs), designed to mitigate memorization risks while maintaining statistical consistency across iterations. Unlike fixed benchmarks, Dynamic-KGQA generates a new dataset variant on every run while preserving the underlying distribution, enabling fair and reproducible evaluations. Furthermore, our framework provides fine-grained control over dataset characteristics, supporting domain-specific and topic-focused QA dataset generation. Additionally, Dynamic-KGQA produces compact, semantically coherent subgraphs that facilitate both training and evaluation of KGQA models, enhancing their ability to leverage structured knowledge effectively. To align with existing evaluation protocols, we also provide static large-scale train/test/validation splits, ensuring comparability with prior methods. By introducing a dynamic, customizable benchmarking paradigm, Dynamic-KGQA enables a more rigorous and adaptable evaluation of QA systems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.

Builds on

41 of 75 references.

References · 41

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  7. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  8. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  9. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  10. 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
  11. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  12. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
29 more
  1. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  2. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
  3. 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 409
  4. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 329
  5. 2023Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 326
  6. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
  7. 2023Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graphcited by 235
  8. 2016Key-Value Memory Networks for Directly Reading Documentscited by 223
  9. 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
  10. 2023Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samplescited by 192
  11. 2019PullNet: Open Domain Question Answering with Iterative Retrieval on Knowledge Bases and Textcited by 182
  12. 2017Variational Reasoning for Question Answering with Knowledge Graphcited by 170
  13. 2020Beyond I.I.D.: Three Levels of Generalization for Question Answering on Knowledge Basescited by 169
  14. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
  15. 2015Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networkscited by 127
  16. 2021Case-based Reasoning for Natural Language Queries over Knowledge Basescited by 107
  17. 2022UniKGQA: Unified Retrieval and Reasoning for Solving Multi-hop Question Answering Over Knowledge Graphcited by 100
  18. 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 100
  19. 2022Subgraph Retrieval Enhanced Model for Multi-hop Knowledge Base Question Answeringcited by 93
  20. 2020Model Patching: Closing the Subgroup Performance Gap with Data Augmentationcited by 82
  21. 2024Plan-on-Graph: Self-Correcting Adaptive Planning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graphscited by 77
  22. 2023Retrieve-Rewrite-Answer: A KG-to-Text Enhanced LLMs Framework for Knowledge Graph Question Answeringcited by 64
  23. 2021Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation Benchmarkingcited by 53
  24. 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
  25. 2023YAGO 4.5: A Large and Clean Knowledge Base with a Rich Taxonomycited by 37
  26. 2023Language Models Hallucinate, but May Excel at Fact Verificationcited by 35
  27. 2024DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graphcited by 26
  28. 2023Fool Your (Vision and) Language Model With Embarrassingly Simple Permutationscited by 24
  29. 2024Enhancing Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs through Evidence Pattern Retrievalcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.