Alleviating Distribution Shift in Synthetic Data for Machine Translation Quality Estimation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Quality Estimation (QE) models evaluate the quality of machine translations without reference translations, serving as the reward models for the translation task. Due to the data scarcity, synthetic data generation has emerged as a promising solution. However, synthetic QE data often suffers from distribution shift, which can manifest as discrepancies between pseudo and real translations, or in pseudo labels that do not align with human preferences. To tackle this issue, we introduce DCSQE, a novel framework for alleviating distribution shift in synthetic QE data. To reduce the difference between pseudo and real translations, we employ the constrained beam search algorithm and enhance translation diversity through the use of distinct generation models. DCSQE uses references, i.e., translation supervision signals, to guide both the generation and annotation processes, enhancing the quality of token-level labels. DCSQE further identifies the shortest phrase covering consecutive error tokens, mimicking human annotation behavior, to assign the final phrase-level labels. Specially, we underscore that the translation model can not annotate translations of itself accurately. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DCSQE outperforms SOTA baselines like CometKiwi in both supervised and unsupervised settings. Further analysis offers insights into synthetic data generation that could benefit reward models for other tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/NJUNLP/njuqe.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.
Builds on
19 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024BPO: Staying Close to the Behavior LLM Creates Better Online LLM Alignment18 Jun
- 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Model23 Jan
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
- 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
- 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 143
- 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
- 2023LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedbackcited by 39
4 more
- 2019PKUSEG: A Toolkit for Multi-Domain Chinese Word Segmentationcited by 17
- 2021Quality Estimation without Human-labeled Datacited by 15
- 2021DirectQE: Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 7
- 2023Unify word-level and span-level tasks: NJUNLP's Participation for the WMT2023 Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026CMI-Mem: Toward Generalizable Long-Term Memory Management via CMI-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Rubric-as-Experts: Case-Specific MQM Rubrics for Translation Error Span Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Looking under the Wrong Lamppost: On the Limitations of Automated Translation Quality Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Data Characterization via Training Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Data Characterization via Training Dynamics30 Sep 2026
- 2026Looking under the Wrong Lamppost: On the Limitations of Automated Translation Quality Estimation4 Aug 2026
- 2026CMI-Mem: Toward Generalizable Long-Term Memory Management via CMI-Augmented Reinforcement Learning15 Jul 2026
- 2026Rubric-as-Experts: Case-Specific MQM Rubrics for Translation Error Span Detection19 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Early-Exit and Instant Confidence Translation Quality Estimation
- 2025LLMs Are Not Scorers: Rethinking MT Evaluation with Generation-Based Methods
- 2025BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages
- 2024QE-EBM: Using Quality Estimators as Energy Loss for Machine Translation
- 2026FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation
- 2025Scaling Low-Resource MT via Synthetic Data Generation with LLMs
- 2026A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data
- 2026A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: MTQE Rewards for Idioms Improve General Translation Quality