mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation

arXiv 2604.21420 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Quality Estimation (QE) aims to assess machine translation quality without reference translations, but recent studies have shown that existing QE models exhibit systematic gender bias. In particular, they tend to favor masculine realizations in gender-ambiguous contexts and may assign higher scores to gender-misaligned translations even when gender is explicitly specified. To address these issues, we propose FairQE, a multi-agent-based, fairness-aware QE framework that mitigates gender bias in both gender-ambiguous and gender-explicit scenarios. FairQE detects gender cues, generates gender-flipped translation variants, and combines conventional QE scores with LLM-based bias-mitigating reasoning through a dynamic bias-aware aggregation mechanism. This design preserves the strengths of existing QE models while calibrating their gender-related biases in a plug-and-play manner. Extensive experiments across multiple gender bias evaluation settings demonstrate that FairQE consistently improves gender fairness over strong QE baselines. Moreover, under MQM-based meta-evaluation following the WMT 2023 Metrics Shared Task, FairQE achieves competitive or improved general QE performance. These results show that gender bias in QE can be effectively mitigated without sacrificing evaluation accuracy, enabling fairer and more reliable translation evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

18 of 35 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  2. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  3. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  4. 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 323
  5. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  6. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  7. 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 146
  8. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 117
  9. 2021A Survey on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processingcited by 89
  10. 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
  11. 2022MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translationcited by 38
  12. 2023Physician Detection of Clinical Harm in Machine Translation: Quality Estimation Aids in Reliance and Backtranslation Identifies Critical Errorscited by 22
6 more
  1. 2023There's no Data Like Better Data: Using QE Metrics for MT Data Filteringcited by 19
  2. 2023GATE: A Challenge Set for Gender-Ambiguous Translation Examplescited by 18
  3. 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
  4. 2025Mind the Inclusivity Gap: Multilingual Gender-Neutral Translation Evaluation with mGeNTEcited by 12
  5. 2024Watching the Watchers: Exposing Gender Disparities in Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 10
  6. 2025GAMBIT+: A Challenge Set for Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translation Quality Estimation Metricscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Translate With Care: Addressing Gender Bias, Neutrality, and Reasoning in Large Language Model Translations
  2. 2025An LLM-as-a-judge Approach for Scalable Gender-Neutral Translation Evaluation
  3. 2025EuroGEST: Investigating gender stereotypes in multilingual language models
  4. 2025Probing Gender Bias in Multilingual LLMs: A Case Study of Stereotypes in Persian
  5. 2025HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluation
  6. 2024Disclosure and Mitigation of Gender Bias in LLMs
  7. 2025Alleviating Distribution Shift in Synthetic Data for Machine Translation Quality Estimation
  8. 2024GenderAlign: An Alignment Dataset for Mitigating Gender Bias in Large Language Models