mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do Deepfake Detectors Work in Reality?

arXiv 2502.10920 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deepfakes, particularly those involving faceswap-based manipulations, have sparked significant societal concern due to their increasing realism and potential for misuse. Despite rapid advancements in generative models, detection methods have not kept pace, creating a critical gap in defense strategies. This disparity is further amplified by the disconnect between academic research and real-world applications, which often prioritize different objectives and evaluation criteria. In this study, we take a pivotal step toward bridging this gap by presenting a novel observation: the post-processing step of super-resolution, commonly employed in real-world scenarios, substantially undermines the effectiveness of existing deepfake detection methods. To substantiate this claim, we introduce and publish the first real-world faceswap dataset, collected from popular online faceswap platforms. We then qualitatively evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art deepfake detectors on real-world deepfakes, revealing that their accuracy approaches the level of random guessing. Furthermore, we quantitatively demonstrate the significant performance degradation caused by common post-processing techniques. By addressing this overlooked challenge, our study underscores a critical avenue for enhancing the robustness and practical applicability of deepfake detection methods in real-world settings.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2025.

Builds on

18 of 27 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  2. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  3. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  4. 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
  5. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
  6. 2021Towards Real-World Blind Face Restoration with Generative Facial Priorcited by 349
  7. 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
  8. 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 319
  9. 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
  10. 2022Towards Robust Blind Face Restoration with Codebook Lookup Transformercited by 231
  11. 2022Self-supervised Learning of Adversarial Example: Towards Good Generalizations for Deepfake Detectioncited by 173
  12. 2023DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detectioncited by 166
6 more
  1. 2020The DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Datasetcited by 132
  2. 2024LAA-Net: Localized Artifact Attention Network for Quality-Agnostic and Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 89
  3. 2022A Continual Deepfake Detection Benchmark: Dataset, Methods, and Essentialscited by 45
  4. 2023Segment anything, from space?cited by 42
  5. 2020Benchmarking deep inverse models over time, and the neural-adjoint methodcited by 28
  6. 2022Automated Extraction of Energy Systems Information from Remotely Sensed Data: A Review and Analysiscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 9.

11 papers.