mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conformal Prediction with Partially Labeled Data

arXiv 2306.01191 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While the predictions produced by conformal prediction are set-valued, the data used for training and calibration is supposed to be precise. In the setting of superset learning or learning from partial labels, a variant of weakly supervised learning, it is exactly the other way around: training data is possibly imprecise (set-valued), but the model induced from this data yields precise predictions. In this paper, we combine the two settings by making conformal prediction amenable to set-valued training data. We propose a generalization of the conformal prediction procedure that can be applied to set-valued training and calibration data. We prove the validity of the proposed method and present experimental studies in which it compares favorably to natural baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

Builds on

9 of 28 references.

References · 9

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  5. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  6. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  7. 2020Structured Prediction with Partial Labelling through the Infimum Losscited by 34
  8. 2021Disambiguation of weak supervision with exponential convergence ratescited by 4
  9. 2014Conservative Inference Rule for Uncertain Reasoning under Incompletenesscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.