Democratic Training Against Universal Adversarial Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite their advances and success, real-world deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Universal adversarial perturbation, an input-agnostic attack, poses a serious threat for them to be deployed in security-sensitive systems. In this case, a single universal adversarial perturbation deceives the model on a range of clean inputs without requiring input-specific optimization, which makes it particularly threatening. In this work, we observe that universal adversarial perturbations usually lead to abnormal entropy spectrum in hidden layers, which suggests that the prediction is dominated by a small number of ``feature'' in such cases (rather than democratically by many features). Inspired by this, we propose an efficient yet effective defense method for mitigating UAPs called Democratic Training by performing entropy-based model enhancement to suppress the effect of the universal adversarial perturbations in a given model. Democratic Training is evaluated with 7 neural networks trained on 5 benchmark datasets and 5 types of state-of-the-art universal adversarial attack methods. The results show that it effectively reduces the attack success rate, improves model robustness and preserves the model accuracy on clean samples.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2025.
Builds on
57 of 82 references.
References · 57
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
38 more
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
- 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
- 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 383
- 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 314
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 234
- 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 175
- 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
- 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
- 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 147
- 2021Feature Importance-aware Transferable Adversarial Attackscited by 127
- 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
- 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 124
- 2018LaVAN: Localized and Visible Adversarial Noisecited by 113
- 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
- 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 111
- 2022Improving Adversarial Transferability via Neuron Attribution-Based Attackscited by 93
- 2017Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 92
- 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 87
- 2019When NAS Meets Robustness: In Search of Robust Architectures against Adversarial Attackscited by 87
- 2020Towards Transferable Adversarial Attack against Deep Face Recognitioncited by 80
- 2019Controlling Neural Level Setscited by 76
- 2017Fast Feature Fool: A data independent approach to universal adversarial perturbationscited by 66
- 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defensescited by 66
- 2021On Generating Transferable Targeted Perturbationscited by 65
- 2020Understanding Adversarial Examples from the Mutual Influence of Images and Perturbationscited by 59
- 2019FDA: Feature Disruptive Attackcited by 56
- 2017NAG: Network for Adversary Generationcited by 51
- 2021Entropy-based Logic Explanations of Neural Networkscited by 51
- 2017Art of singular vectors and universal adversarial perturbationscited by 49
- 2017Defense against Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 48
- 2022DISCO: Adversarial Defense with Local Implicit Functionscited by 34
- 2020Efficient Robust Training via Backward Smoothingcited by 29
- 2020CD-UAP: Class Discriminative Universal Adversarial Perturbationcited by 27
- 2018Defending Against Universal Perturbations With Shared Adversarial Trainingcited by 25
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025HAMLOCK: HArdware-Model LOgically Combined attacKcited by 0
- 2025HAMLOCK: HArdware-Model LOgically Combined attacK22 Oct 2025