Scaling laws in wearable human activity recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many deep architectures and self-supervised pre-training techniques have been proposed for human activity recognition (HAR) from wearable multimodal sensors. Scaling laws have the potential to help move towards more principled design by linking model capacity with pre-training data volume. Yet, scaling laws have not been established for HAR to the same extent as in language and vision. By conducting an exhaustive grid search on both amount of pre-training data and Transformer architectures, we establish the first known scaling laws for HAR. We show that pre-training loss scales with a power law relationship to amount of data and parameter count and that increasing the number of users in a dataset results in a steeper improvement in performance than increasing data per user, indicating that diversity of pre-training data is important, which contrasts to some previously reported findings in self-supervised HAR. We show that these scaling laws translate to downstream performance improvements on three HAR benchmark datasets of postures, modes of locomotion and activities of daily living: UCI HAR and WISDM Phone and WISDM Watch. Finally, we suggest some previously published works should be revisited in light of these scaling laws with more adequate model capacities.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.
Builds on
16 of 39 references.
References · 16
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 125
- 2023Large-scale Training of Foundation Models for Wearable Biosignalscited by 89
- 2022Self-supervised Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using 700,000 Person-days of Wearable Datacited by 71
- 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 63
- 2016Recognizing Detailed Human Context In-the-Wild from Smartphones and Smartwatchescited by 41
4 more
- 2021Improving Deep Learning for HAR with shallow LSTMscited by 30
- 2020Human Activity Recognition using Inertial, Physiological and Environmental Sensors: a Comprehensive Surveycited by 26
- 2024CAPTURE-24: A large dataset of wrist-worn activity tracker data collected in the wild for human activity recognitioncited by 18
- 2023Virtual Fusion with Contrastive Learning for Single Sensor-based Activity Recognitioncited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Experience Paper: Adopting Activity Recognition in On-demand Food Delivery Businesscited by 1
- 2026Inertia-1: An Open Exploration of Wearable Motion Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2025Bridging Generalization and Personalization in Human Activity Recognition via On-Device Few-Shot Learningcited by 0
- 2026MorphCL: Morphological Contrastive Learning for Inertial-based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026MorphCL: Morphological Contrastive Learning for Inertial-based Human Activity Recognition7 Oct 2026
- 2026Inertia-1: An Open Exploration of Wearable Motion Foundation Models7 Jul 2026
- 2025Experience Paper: Adopting Activity Recognition in On-demand Food Delivery Business29 Sep 2025
- 2025Bridging Generalization and Personalization in Human Activity Recognition via On-Device Few-Shot Learning21 Aug 2025