Reward Learning as Doubly Nonparametric Bandits: Optimal Design and Scaling Laws
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Specifying reward functions for complex tasks like object manipulation or driving is challenging to do by hand. Reward learning seeks to address this by learning a reward model using human feedback on selected query policies. This shifts the burden of reward specification to the optimal design of the queries. We propose a theoretical framework for studying reward learning and the associated optimal experiment design problem. Our framework models rewards and policies as nonparametric functions belonging to subsets of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHSs). The learner receives (noisy) oracle access to a true reward and must output a policy that performs well under the true reward. For this setting, we first derive non-asymptotic excess risk bounds for a simple plug-in estimator based on ridge regression. We then solve the query design problem by optimizing these risk bounds with respect to the choice of query set and obtain a finite sample statistical rate, which depends primarily on the eigenvalue spectrum of a certain linear operator on the RKHSs. Despite the generality of these results, our bounds are stronger than previous bounds developed for more specialized problems. We specifically show that the well-studied problem of Gaussian process (GP) bandit optimization is a special case of our framework, and that our bounds either improve or are competitive with known regret guarantees for the Mat'ern kernel.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 12 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.
Builds on
12 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
- 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 156
- 2019Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries: Learning to Summarise Without Referencescited by 76
- 2017Stochastic Zeroth-order Optimization in High Dimensionscited by 62
- 2020Bandit optimisation of functions in the Mat'ern kernel RKHScited by 40
- 2020On Lower Bounds for Standard and Robust Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 29
- 2021Bandit Phase Retrievalcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021Learning from an Exploring Demonstrator: Optimal Reward Estimation for Bandits
- 2026On the Complexity of Preference-Based Bandits
- 2023Contextual Bandits and Imitation Learning via Preference-Based Active Queries
- 2026Invariance-Based Dynamic Regret Minimization
- 2022Flexible and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Oracles
- 2024Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human Preferences
- 2023The Choice of Noninformative Priors for Thompson Sampling in Multiparameter Bandit Models
- 2024Optimal Design for Reward Modeling in RLHF