Policy Design for Two-sided Platforms with Participation Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In two-sided platforms (e.g., video streaming or e-commerce), viewers and providers engage in interactive dynamics: viewers benefit from increases in provider populations, while providers benefit from increases in viewer population. Despite the importance of such "population effects" on long-term platform health, recommendation policies do not generally take the participation dynamics into account. This paper thus studies the dynamics and recommender policy design on two-sided platforms under the population effects for the first time. Our control- and game-theoretic findings warn against the use of the standard "myopic-greedy" policy and shed light on the importance of provider-side considerations (i.e., effectively distributing exposure among provider groups) to improve social welfare via population growth. We also present a simple algorithm to optimize long-term social welfare by taking the population effects into account, and demonstrate its effectiveness in synthetic and real-data experiments. Our experiment code is available at https://github.com/sdean-group/dynamics-two-sided-market.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
References · 22
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
- 2020Performative Predictioncited by 327
- 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 190
- 2022KuaiRec: A Fully-observed Dataset and Insights for Evaluating Recommender Systemscited by 96
- 2020Performative Prediction in a Stateful Worldcited by 90
- 2022Multiplayer Performative Prediction: Learning in Decision-Dependent Gamescited by 44
- 2019On Finding Local Nash Equilibria (and Only Local Nash Equilibria) in Zero-Sum Gamescited by 35
- 2022Modeling Content Creator Incentives on Algorithm-Curated Platformscited by 35
- 2022Supply-Side Equilibria in Recommender Systemscited by 33
- 2020Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approachcited by 32
10 more
- 2023How Bad is Top-K Recommendation under Competing Content Creators?cited by 27
- 2020User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Marketscited by 23
- 2023Rethinking Incentives in Recommender Systems: Are Monotone Rewards Always Beneficial?cited by 10
- 2024User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creatorscited by 10
- 2023Modeling Recommender Ecosystems: Research Challenges at the Intersection of Mechanism Design, Reinforcement Learning and Generative Modelscited by 7
- 2024Unveiling User Satisfaction and Creator Productivity Trade-Offs in Recommendation Platformscited by 6
- 2023Content Prompting: Modeling Content Provider Dynamics to Improve User Welfare in Recommender Ecosystemscited by 5
- 2023SARDINE: A Simulator for Automated Recommendation in Dynamic and Interactive Environmentscited by 5
- 2023Initializing Services in Interactive ML Systems for Diverse Userscited by 5
- 2023Matching of Users and Creators in Two-Sided Markets with Departurescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025LLM-Based User Simulation for Low-Knowledge Shilling Attacks on Recommender Systemscited by 3
- 2025Evolutionary Prediction Gamescited by 0
- 2025LLM-Based User Simulation for Low-Knowledge Shilling Attacks on Recommender Systems18 May 2025
- 2025Evolutionary Prediction Games5 Mar 2025