mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Avoiding mathbfexp(Rmax) scaling in RLHF through Preference-based Exploration

arXiv 2502.00666 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a pivotal technique for large language model (LLM) alignment. This paper studies the setting of online RLHF and focus on improving sample efficiency. All existing algorithms in online RLHF, whether doing passive exploration or active exploration, suffer from a sample complexity that scales exponentially with the scale of the reward function. This fundamental limitation hinders their effectiveness in scenarios with heavily skewed preferences, e.g. questions with a unique correct solution. To address this, we introduce Self-Exploring Preference-Incentive Online Preference Optimization (SE-POPO), an online RLHF algorithm that for the first time achieves a sample complexity that scales polynomially with the reward scale, answering an open problem raised by Xie et al. (2024).. Theoretically, we demonstrate that the sample complexity of SE-POPO dominates that of existing exploration algorithms. Empirically, our systematic evaluation confirms that SE-POPO is more sample-efficient than both exploratory and non-exploratory baselines, in two primary application scenarios of RLHF as well as on public benchmarks, marking a significant step forward in RLHF algorithm design. The code is available at https://github.com/MYC000801/SE-POPO.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 54 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2025.

Builds on

54 of 63 references.

Closest ancestors · 19

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Regressing the Relative Future: Efficient Policy Optimization for Multi-turn RLHF6 Oct
  2. 2024Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF31 May
  3. 2024Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF29 May
  4. 2024Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer26 May
  5. 2024Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback23 May
  6. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF13 May
  7. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment1 May
  8. 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF29 Apr
  9. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferences4 Apr
  10. 2024Active Preference Optimization for Sample Efficient RLHF16 Feb
  11. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  12. 2023Making RL with Preference-based Feedback Efficient via Randomization23 Oct
7 more
  1. 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHF5 Oct
  2. 2023Is RLHF More Difficult than Standard RL?25 Jun
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  4. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback17 May
  5. 2023Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise Comparisons26 Jan
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 35

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  9. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  10. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  11. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,055
  12. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
23 more
  1. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
  2. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  3. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
  4. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  5. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 506
  6. 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedbackcited by 260
  7. 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 186
  8. 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHFcited by 183
  9. 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 118
  10. 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Losscited by 108
  11. 2021Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferencescited by 106
  12. 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 102
  13. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  14. 2022Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximationcited by 81
  15. 2024Building Math Agents with Multi-Turn Iterative Preference Learningcited by 66
  16. 2020Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guaranteescited by 65
  17. 2024Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignmentcited by 63
  18. 2019Dueling Posterior Sampling for Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
  19. 2022GEC: A Unified Framework for Interactive Decision Making in MDP, POMDP, and Beyondcited by 46
  20. 2024Efficient Exploration for LLMscited by 45
  21. 2023Language Model Alignment with Elastic Resetcited by 34
  22. 2024The Crucial Role of Samplers in Online Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 27
  23. 2024Self-Play with Adversarial Critic: Provable and Scalable Offline Alignment for Language Modelscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration
  2. 2024Hybrid Preference Optimization for Alignment: Provably Faster Convergence Rates by Combining Offline Preferences with Online Exploration
  3. 2025Provably Efficient Online RLHF with One-Pass Reward Modeling
  4. 2023Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration
  5. 2025Towards Efficient Online Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
  6. 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models
  7. 2024Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment
  8. 2024West-of-N: Synthetic Preferences for Self-Improving Reward Models