mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data-dependent Exploration for Online Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

arXiv 2605.04477 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Online reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a promising paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) by continuously collecting new preference feedback during training. A foundational challenge in this setting is exploration, which requires algorithms that enable the LLMs to generate informative comparisons that improve sample-efficiency in online RLHF. Existing exploration strategies often derive bonuses via on-policy expectations, which are difficult to estimate reliably from the limited historical preference data available during training; as a result, the policy can prematurely down-weight under-explored regions that may contain high-value behaviors. In this paper, we propose data-dependent exploration for preference optimization (DEPO), a simple and scalable method that leverages historical data to construct an extra uncertainty bonus for high-uncertainty regions, encouraging exploration toward potentially high-value data. Theoretically, we provide a data-dependent regret bound for the proposed algorithm, showing that it adapts to the hardness of the learning task itself and can be tighter than worst-case bounds in practice. Empirically, the proposed method consistently outperforms strong baselines across benchmarks, demonstrating improved sample efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

27 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Avoiding mathbfexp(Rmax) scaling in RLHF through Preference-based Exploration2 Feb
  2. 2024Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF31 May
  3. 2024Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF29 May
  4. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF13 May
  5. 2023Diversity from Human Feedback10 Oct
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  7. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback17 May
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 19

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  8. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  9. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  10. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  11. 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedbackcited by 257
  12. 2024MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialoguescited by 247
7 more
  1. 2024Building Math Agents with Multi-Turn Iterative Preference Learningcited by 66
  2. 2024Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignmentcited by 63
  3. 2024The Importance of Online Data: Understanding Preference Fine-tuning via Coveragecited by 55
  4. 2024Efficient Exploration for LLMscited by 44
  5. 2025Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Updatecited by 16
  6. 2025Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Trainingcited by 16
  7. 2019Clustered Reinforcement Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Efficient Online Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
  2. 2023Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration
  3. 2025Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration
  4. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  5. 2025Provably Efficient Online RLHF with One-Pass Reward Modeling
  6. 2024Hybrid Preference Optimization for Alignment: Provably Faster Convergence Rates by Combining Offline Preferences with Online Exploration
  7. 2025Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback via Information-Directed Sampling
  8. 2024Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queries