mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Models

arXiv 2501.05727 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Despite their remarkable performance, Large Language Models (LLMs) face a critical challenge: providing feedback for tasks where human evaluation is difficult or where LLMs potentially outperform humans. In such scenarios, leveraging the critique ability of LLMs themselves - identifying and correcting flaws - shows considerable promise. This paper explores enhancing critique abilities of LLMs, noting that current approaches rely on human annotations or more powerful models, leaving the challenge of improving critique abilities without external supervision unresolved. We introduce SCRIT (Self-evolving CRITic), a framework that trains LLMs with self-generated data to evolve their critique abilities. To address the low quality of naively generated data, we propose a contrastive-critic approach that uses reference solutions during data synthesis to enhance the model's understanding of key concepts, and incorporates a self-validation scheme to ensure data quality. The final trained model operates without any reference solutions at inference time. Implemented with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, a leading LLM, SCRIT demonstrates consistent improvements across a wide range of benchmarks spanning both mathematical and scientific reasoning: achieving a 10.0% relative gain in critique-correction accuracy and a 19.0% relative improvement in error identification F1-score. Our analysis reveals that SCRIT's performance scales positively with data and model size and enables continuous improvement through multi-round iterations.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2025.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet3 Oct

Other references · 25

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  9. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  10. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  11. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  12. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
13 more
  1. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  2. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,093
  3. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
  4. 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 372
  5. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 277
  6. 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 276
  7. 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 212
  8. 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
  9. 2023Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmarkcited by 182
  10. 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
  11. 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 138
  12. 2024Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 68
  13. 2024Training Language Models to Critique With Multi-agent Feedbackcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 3.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RealCritic: Towards Effectiveness-Driven Evaluation of Language Model Critiques
  2. 2024CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning
  3. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing
  4. 2024Mind the Gap: Examining the Self-Improvement Capabilities of Large Language Models
  5. 2025CRITICTOOL: Evaluating Self-Critique Capabilities of Large Language Models in Tool-Calling Error Scenarios
  6. 2026Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlook
  7. 2025Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Evaluating the Premise Critique Ability of Large Language Models
  8. 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervision