CritICL: Inference-Time Weak-to-Strong Generalization from Small Language Model Failure Modes
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in inference-time scaling have significantly improved the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs). However, these methods typically rely on repeated generation or external verification. To address this limitation, we introduce CritICL, a novel inference-time framework that improves reasoning while maintaining high efficiency. Our key insight is that LLM failure modes exhibit structured patterns across model scales within the same family. Instead of treating failures as undesirable outputs, CritICL leverages them as a source of guidance. Specifically, we utilize failure modes derived from weaker models and incorporate them into inference through critique-based in-context examples. We propose two variants: CritICL-dynamic, which adaptively predicts input-specific failure modes and retrieves critiques, and CritICL-static, which uses a global failure mode profile to provide stable guidance. Experimental results show that CritICL consistently outperforms standard in-context learning and achieves performance competitive with or superior to test-time scaling methods, while requiring significantly fewer generations and lower token cost. Code available at: https://github.com/umwyf/CRITICL
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Models10 Jan
- 2024Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct Reasoning26 Apr
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing19 May
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar
Other references · 20
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
- 2024An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4cited by 94
8 more
- 2024Metacognitive Capabilities of LLMs: An Exploration in Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 84
- 2025ReasonIR: Training Retrievers for Reasoning Taskscited by 77
- 2023Learning to Retrieve In-Context Examples for Large Language Modelscited by 60
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 48
- 2024Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 41
- 2025Skill-Targeted Adaptive Trainingcited by 6
- 2025AdaptMI: Adaptive Skill-based In-context Math Instruction for Small Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025W2S-AlignTree: Weak-to-Strong Inference-Time Alignment for Large Language Models via Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning
- 2025Double-Checker: Enhancing Reasoning of Slow-Thinking LLMs via Self-Critical Fine-Tuning
- 2025RealCritic: Towards Effectiveness-Driven Evaluation of Language Model Critiques
- 2025CRITICTOOL: Evaluating Self-Critique Capabilities of Large Language Models in Tool-Calling Error Scenarios
- 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning
- 2025Critique to Verify: Accurate and Honest Test-Time Scaling with RL-Trained Verifiers