mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Tuna: Instruction Tuning using Feedback from Large Language Models

arXiv 2310.13385 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning of open-source large language models (LLMs) like LLaMA, using direct outputs from more powerful LLMs such as Instruct-GPT and GPT-4, has proven to be a cost-effective way to align model behaviors with human preferences. However, the instruction-tuned model has only seen one response per instruction, lacking the knowledge of potentially better responses. In this paper, we propose finetuning an instruction-tuned LLM using our novel textitprobabilistic ranking and textitcontextual ranking approaches to increase the likelihood of generating better responses. Probabilistic ranking enables the instruction-tuned model to inherit the relative rankings of high-quality and low-quality responses from the teacher LLM. On the other hand, learning with contextual ranking allows the model to refine its own response distribution using the contextual understanding ability of stronger LLMs. Furthermore, we apply probabilistic ranking and contextual ranking sequentially to the instruction-tuned LLM. The resulting model, which we call Tuna, consistently improves the performance on Super Natural Instructions (119 test tasks), LMentry (25 test tasks), Vicuna QA, and can even obtain better results than several strong reinforcement learning baselines. Our code and data are available at url https://github.com/microsoft/LMOps.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 35 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.

Builds on

35 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 33

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,072
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,884
  7. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,657
  8. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,480
  9. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,317
  10. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,871
  11. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,765
  12. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,412
21 more
  1. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,286
  2. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,228
  3. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,111
  4. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,027
  5. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 865
  6. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 770
  7. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 745
  8. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 720
  9. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 697
  10. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 573
  11. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 459
  12. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 416
  13. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 407
  14. 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 395
  15. 2020Extractive Summarization as Text Matchingcited by 189
  16. 2022BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarizationcited by 161
  17. 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 127
  18. 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
  19. 2022Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generationcited by 121
  20. 2023On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as Referencescited by 80
  21. 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
  2. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  3. 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
  4. 2025Instruction Tuning with and without Context: Behavioral Shifts and Downstream Impact
  5. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4
  6. 2024MAmmoTH2: Scaling Instructions from the Web
  7. 2023Reflection-Tuning: Data Recycling Improves LLM Instruction-Tuning
  8. 2026GIFT: Guided Fine-Tuning and Transfer for Enhancing Instruction-Tuned Language Models