mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLaDMoP: Learning Transferrable Models from Successful Clinical Trials via LLMs

arXiv 2505.18527 ↗First posted 24 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many existing models for clinical trial outcome prediction are optimized using task-specific loss functions on trial phase-specific data. While this scheme may boost prediction for common diseases and drugs, it can hinder learning of generalizable representations, leading to more false positives/negatives. To address this limitation, we introduce CLaDMoP, a new pre-training approach for clinical trial outcome prediction, alongside the Successful Clinical Trials dataset(SCT), specifically designed for this task. CLaDMoP leverages a Large Language Model-to encode trials' eligibility criteria-linked to a lightweight Drug-Molecule branch through a novel multi-level fusion technique. To efficiently fuse long embeddings across levels, we incorporate a grouping block, drastically reducing computational overhead. CLaDMoP avoids reliance on task-specific objectives by pre-training on a "pair matching" proxy task. Compared to established zero-shot and few-shot baselines, our method significantly improves both PR-AUC and ROC-AUC, especially for phase I and phase II trials. We further evaluate and perform ablation on CLaDMoP after Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning, comparing it to state-of-the-art supervised baselines, including MEXA-CTP, on the Trial Outcome Prediction(TOP) benchmark. CLaDMoP achieves up to 10.5% improvement in PR-AUC and 3.6% in ROC-AUC, while attaining comparable F1 score to MEXA-CTP, highlighting its potential for clinical trial outcome prediction. Code and SCT dataset can be downloaded from https://github.com/murai-lab/CLaDMoP.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  3. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  4. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
  5. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  6. 2022BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Miningcited by 531
  7. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  8. 2023Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewritescited by 216
  9. 2021Scaling Deep Contrastive Learning Batch Size under Memory Limited Setupcited by 123
  10. 2021HINT: Hierarchical Interaction Network for Trial Outcome Prediction Leveraging Web Datacited by 49
  11. 2020COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial Matchingcited by 37
  12. 2023Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matchingcited by 30
8 more
  1. 2023Scaling Clinical Trial Matching Using Large Language Models: A Case Study in Oncologycited by 24
  2. 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuningcited by 10
  3. 2019Doctor2Vec: Dynamic Doctor Representation Learning for Clinical Trial Recruitmentcited by 9
  4. 2020Predicting Clinical Trial Results by Implicit Evidence Integrationcited by 6
  5. 2023Cauchy Loss Function: Robustness Under Gaussian and Cauchy Noisecited by 5
  6. 2024Reducing Biases towards Minoritized Populations in Medical Curricular Content via Artificial Intelligence for Fairer Health Outcomescited by 5
  7. 2023UCE-FID: Using Large Unlabeled, Medium Crowdsourced-Labeled, and Small Expert-Labeled Tweets for Foodborne Illness Detectioncited by 3
  8. 2025MEXA-CTP: Mode Experts Cross-Attention for Clinical Trial Outcome Predictioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.