mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SPA: Efficient User-Preference Alignment against Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2411.15513 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Medical image segmentation data inherently contain uncertainty. This can stem from both imperfect image quality and variability in labeling preferences on ambiguous pixels, which depend on annotator expertise and the clinical context of the annotations. For instance, a boundary pixel might be labeled as tumor in diagnosis to avoid under-estimation of severity, but as normal tissue in radiotherapy to prevent damage to sensitive structures. As segmentation preferences vary across downstream applications, it is often desirable for an image segmentation model to offer user-adaptable predictions rather than a fixed output. While prior uncertainty-aware and interactive methods offer adaptability, they are inefficient at test time: uncertainty-aware models require users to choose from numerous similar outputs, while interactive models demand significant user input through click or box prompts to refine segmentation. To address these challenges, we propose SPA, a new Segmentation Preference Alignment framework that efficiently adapts to diverse test-time preferences with minimal human interaction. By presenting users with a select few, distinct segmentation candidates that best capture uncertainties, it reduces the user workload to reach the preferred segmentation. To accommodate user preference, we introduce a probabilistic mechanism that leverages user feedback to adapt a model's segmentation preference. The proposed framework is evaluated on several medical image segmentation tasks: color fundus images, lung lesion and kidney CT scans, MRI scans of brain and prostate. SPA shows 1) a significant reduction in user time and effort compared to existing interactive segmentation approaches, 2) strong adaptability based on human feedback, and 3) state-of-the-art image segmentation performance across different imaging modalities and semantic labels.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2024.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  4. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  5. 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
  6. 2023Medical SAM Adapter: Adapting Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 485
  7. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 399
  8. 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 281
  9. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 220
  10. 2021Reviving Iterative Training with Mask Guidance for Interactive Segmentationcited by 162
  11. 2024Medical SAM 2: Segment medical images as video via Segment Anything Model 2cited by 151
  12. 2019PHiSeg: Capturing Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 128
12 more
  1. 2017Interactive Medical Image Segmentation using Deep Learning with Image-specific Fine-tuningcited by 110
  2. 2022SimpleClick: Interactive Image Segmentation with Simple Vision Transformerscited by 109
  3. 2016Learning in an Uncertain World: Representing Ambiguity Through Multiple Hypothesescited by 96
  4. 2017Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classificationcited by 77
  5. 2019A Hierarchical Probabilistic U-Net for Modeling Multi-Scale Ambiguitiescited by 65
  6. 2023A Review of Uncertainty Estimation and its Application in Medical Imagingcited by 59
  7. 2020Disentangling Human Error from the Ground Truth in Segmentation of Medical Imagescited by 58
  8. 2018AnatomyNet: Deep Learning for Fast and Fully Automated Whole-volume Segmentation of Head and Neck Anatomycited by 54
  9. 2023A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methodscited by 39
  10. 2022REFUGE2 Challenge: A Treasure Trove for Multi-Dimension Analysis and Evaluation in Glaucoma Screeningcited by 37
  11. 2019Interactive segmentation of medical images through fully convolutional neural networkscited by 29
  12. 2024QUBIQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Biomedical Image Segmentation Challengecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MedCLIPSeg: Probabilistic Vision-Language Adaptation for Data-Efficient and Generalizable Medical Image Segmentation
  2. 2025Enhancing SAM with Efficient Prompting and Preference Optimization for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation
  3. 2025Beyond Manual Annotation: A Human-AI Collaborative Framework for Medical Image Segmentation Using Only "Better or Worse" Expert Feedback
  4. 2026Region-Normalized DPO for Medical Image Segmentation under Noisy Judges
  5. 2026SegMoTE: Token-Level Mixture of Experts for Medical Image Segmentation
  6. 2025Aleatoric Uncertainty Medical Image Segmentation Estimation via Flow Matching
  7. 2025Model Agnostic Preference Optimization for Medical Image Segmentation
  8. 2025SAMPO-Path: Segmentation Intent-Aligned Preference Optimization for Pathology Foundation Model Segmentation